is one of the chroniclers of the dystopian realization of the American Dream, and "Born in the USA" is perhaps his most famous version of it, although deeply misunderstood by conservatives at the time of its release. Springsteen's persistent themes concern the loss of the American Dream of a life well lived, of honest jobs and good employers. These are persistent themes; elsewhere he noted that "lately there ain't been much work on account of the economy" (Springsteen, 1980). The economy, as Emmison (1983) noted, is a relatively recent concept, conceived of as a sphere of specific activity, dating at the earliest from the late nineteenth century, and it has a similar genealogical and national origin as management, being born in the United States. Managerialism is a later corruption of the study of management, introduced by F. W. Taylor; it is less concerned than Taylor with how things are best made and is more concerned with Taylor's teleological goal of producing a specific kind of efficiency, usually justified in terms of "the economy." It is this utilitarian conception that has characterized managerialism from its inception in Taylor. In this essay I review two recent accounts of managerialism. The point of doing so is to focus on the research-practice "gap" so often noted. I do so not to lament it but, instead, to suggest that management research all too often has been taken up in practice to ignoble effect. I begin by discussing the broad parameters of managerialism before considering it as ideology, argument, and genealogy in order to lead to a consideration of ethics and the moral basis of order as it is exhibited in different instances of culture and management studies. I conclude by noting the doleful impact of managerialism on management. MANAGERIALISM Managerialism, as a distortion of the study of management, is something also born in the United States, in the mid twentieth century, according to the two books under review. So what is managerialism? According to Locke, it is what occurs when a special group, called management, ensconces itself systematically in an organization and deprives owners and employees of their decision-making power (including the distribution of emoluments)-and justifies that takeover on the grounds of the managing group's education and exclusive possession of the codified bodies of knowledge and know-how necessary to the efficient running of the organization, (2009: 28). By contrast Klikauer emphasizes ideology: Managerialism combines management knowledge and ideology to establish itself systematically in organizations and society while depriving owners, employees, (organizational-economical) and civil society (social-political) of all decision-making powers. Managerialism justifies the application of managerial techniques to all areas of society on the grounds of superior ideology, expert training, and the exclusive possession of managerial knowledge necessary to efficiently run corporations and societies … Management + Ideology + Expansion = Managerialism (Klikauer, 2013: 2,...