2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visuospatial asymmetry and non-spatial attention in subacute stroke patients with and without neglect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite intact performance at paper-and-pencil tests for neglect assessment, the better dual-task performance obtained by the drivers group was interpreted as though these patients were more efficient in dealing with complex visuospatial tasks requiring intact divided attention skills. A simple yet challenging driving environment, where lateral items had to be detected, was reproduced in an experimental study where more patients were classified as affected by neglect according to reaction time asymmetry in the “driving” task than the BIT criteria (van Kessel et al, 2010). Within the RBD group, patients with both RT asymmetries and pathological BIT scores showed longer ipsilesional RTs than patients with RT asymmetries only.…”
Section: Computer-based Testing and Increased Task Demands Results In mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite intact performance at paper-and-pencil tests for neglect assessment, the better dual-task performance obtained by the drivers group was interpreted as though these patients were more efficient in dealing with complex visuospatial tasks requiring intact divided attention skills. A simple yet challenging driving environment, where lateral items had to be detected, was reproduced in an experimental study where more patients were classified as affected by neglect according to reaction time asymmetry in the “driving” task than the BIT criteria (van Kessel et al, 2010). Within the RBD group, patients with both RT asymmetries and pathological BIT scores showed longer ipsilesional RTs than patients with RT asymmetries only.…”
Section: Computer-based Testing and Increased Task Demands Results In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…– The true impairment suffered by patients is revealed, in the chronic phase, only when attentional resources, otherwise implemented to contrast and compensate for the contralesional bias, cannot be effectively allocated (e.g., Bartolomeo, 1997, 2000; Marzi et al, 2002; Deouell et al, 2005; Rengachary et al, 2009; Bonato et al, 2010, 2012a; van Kessel et al, 2010; Hasegawa et al, 2011). …”
Section: Final Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients with right hemispheric lesions and neglect (but without visual field defects) target detection tends to be less accurate and slower within the left than right visual field (e. g. (Butler et al, 2004;Crottaz-Herbette et al, Submitted;Deouell et al, 2005;Eramudugolla et al, 2010;van Kessel et al, 2010). A brief session of rightward PA was shown to improve performance within the left space in easy (Crottaz-Herbette et al, Submitted) and in demanding tasks.…”
Section: Target Detection: Rightward Prismatic Adaptation Induces a Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a wide range of studies of neglect have described the presence of a lateralized bias in orienting (as outlined above), as well as an asymmetry of the omissions toward the contralesional side Halligan, Cockburn, & Wilson, 1991;Halligan, Marshall, & Wade, 1989;Samuelsson, Hjelmquist, Naver, & Blomstrand, 1995; van Kessel, van Nes, Brouwer, Geurts, & Fasotti, 2010). In a recent review Karnath and Rorden (2012) concluded that these symptoms of spatial bias in orienting and omissions are so fundamental in the clinical setting that they can be defined as core symptoms of spatial neglect (see also Schenk & Karnath, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%