Visuomotor memory is not bound to visual motion

Abstract

Sensory feedback plays a critical role in motor control and motor learning, with both processes adjusting outgoing motor commands relative to the error between actual sensory feedback and the predictions of a forward model. However, models of motor control rarely specify the exact nature of these predictions. We hypothesized that large differences in low-level perceptual feedback would delineate contextual boundaries for motor memory, as sufficiently different feedback would require a distinct mapping between motor commands and sensory states. We tested this hypothesis by measuring transfer of visuomotor adaptation across contexts where hand movements caused visual motion in opposite directions (180° away). Instead of observing that visual feedback is bound to distinct internal models, we found nearly complete transfer of learning across the contexts. Finally, we found evidence that the motor memory was bound to the planned displacement of the hand, rather than visual features of the task space.

Input device matters for measures of behaviour in online experiments

“…In certain cases, these differences may not be important. For example, where assessed, the input device does not appear to significantly influence visuomotor adaptation (Kim et al, 2022;Tsay et al, 2021;Tsay et al, 2024;Warburton et al, 2023b;Watral et al, 2023). In other areas, these differences may be critically important, and the onus will be on experimenters to account for this potentially confounding variable within their specific experiments.…”