Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visuo-motor imagery of specific manual actions: A multi-variate pattern analysis fMRI study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(121 reference statements)
6
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The asymmetry in decoding direction is significant (P < 0.001). This phenomenon of asymmetric generalization has been reported in other studies (28)(29)(30)(31), and the exact source remains unclear (32). One possible interpretation that has been put forward is that it reflects the underlying nature of the representations; for instance, the auditory trials might activate only a subset of voxels that contain categorical information, whereas the visual trials activate the majority of VTC voxels.…”
Section: Neurosciencesupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The asymmetry in decoding direction is significant (P < 0.001). This phenomenon of asymmetric generalization has been reported in other studies (28)(29)(30)(31), and the exact source remains unclear (32). One possible interpretation that has been put forward is that it reflects the underlying nature of the representations; for instance, the auditory trials might activate only a subset of voxels that contain categorical information, whereas the visual trials activate the majority of VTC voxels.…”
Section: Neurosciencesupporting
confidence: 53%
“…aIPS is also related to a multi-modal or abstract action representation revealed by recent MVPA studies (Ogawa and Inui 2011;Oosterhof et al 2012). Furthermore, the anterior part of IPL in the left hemisphere is related to encoding action goals (Hamilton and Grafton 10 2006) or tool-related action outcomes (Leshinskaya and Caramazza 2015).…”
Section: Iplmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Notably, the degree of such shared activation appears to vary with the complexity of the imagined musical stimulus, with more shared activation for simple stimuli than for complex stimuli such as ecologically valid music (Schaefer et al, 2013). The overlap between imagery and perception is not unique to the auditory modality; both visual and movement imagination have been found to activate modality-specific brain regions (Kosslyn et al, 2001; Pfurtscheller et al, 2006), and imagery content can even be decoded from the brain responses in visual and motor areas (Cichy et al, 2012; Oosterhof et al, 2012). The implication is that aspects of the imagined stimulus or action are being processed much in the way the actually perceived stimulus or performed action might be, usually with a weaker signature in modality-specific regions (Kosslyn et al, 2001) and together with additional, modality non-specific frontal and parietal activations that are related to imagery quality or vividness, likely involving memory and attentional processes related to the cognitive effort of imagining (Daselaar et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%