2009
DOI: 10.1117/12.813786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visually lossless compression of breast biopsy virtual slides for telepathology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous study [1], bit rates corresponding to visually lossless JPEG2000 compression were measured with human observers for image regions selected from pathology virtual slides. Observer performance in 2AFC (alternative forced choice) trials showed that compression ratios of about 7:1 or four times the reversible compression ratio could be achieved before losses were detectable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study [1], bit rates corresponding to visually lossless JPEG2000 compression were measured with human observers for image regions selected from pathology virtual slides. Observer performance in 2AFC (alternative forced choice) trials showed that compression ratios of about 7:1 or four times the reversible compression ratio could be achieved before losses were detectable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, using a two alternative forced choice (2AFC) test, Johnson et al 11 demonstrated that pathologists are sensitive to even minute differences between images when they are presented on the screen together, and that the threshold of detection corresponded to JP2 compression ratios as low as 7. 17 In comparison, in this study, JP2 at the highest quality setting tested produced compression ratios of 50-130, suggesting that the use of standard WSI scanner settings may potentially introduce visually discriminable compression artifacts. However, it should be noted that the carefully controlled 2AFC test employed by Johnson et al introduced significant artifice; pathologists are rarely faced with the task of comparing nearly identical images side-by-side in a controlled setting with the intent to determine whether differences exist.…”
Section: Perceptual Impact Of Compressionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…19 The JND tools have been reported to be a better predictor of human observer performance than parameters such as peak signal-tonoise ratio or mean-squared error. 34,35 The JNDmetrix visual system model has predicted and correlated highly with radiologists' performance in using softcopy display monitors with different phosphors 13 and on-axis viewing liquid crystal display displays compared with CRT viewing. 14 It has also been used to optimize a mammography display.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%