2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.parco.2021.102758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualizing the world’s largest turbulence simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…OSPRay installations have shown massive improvements over GL or Mesa, especially for real-time interactive visualization and when performing large tasks on KNL and Intel Xeon architecture [43]. While this is an appealing solution, its investigation will be left to future studies [44]. For the moment we conclude that the Mesa version of VISIT can already take a huge advantage Fig.…”
Section: B Visit: Discussion On Cpu-defined Performancementioning
confidence: 86%
“…OSPRay installations have shown massive improvements over GL or Mesa, especially for real-time interactive visualization and when performing large tasks on KNL and Intel Xeon architecture [43]. While this is an appealing solution, its investigation will be left to future studies [44]. For the moment we conclude that the Mesa version of VISIT can already take a huge advantage Fig.…”
Section: B Visit: Discussion On Cpu-defined Performancementioning
confidence: 86%
“…Game engines had previously been used in CAVE systems [15], in that case, however, the CAVE did not support stereoscopy and was not equipped with a tracking system. With the development of the nDisplay plugin 4 , it was possible to use UE4 4 https://docs.unrealengine.com/4.27/en-US/ for a CAVE and a Powerwall display setup, which only required the addition of tracking via VRPN [26].…”
Section: Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accelerators are also a very good example to illustrate why accounting models should not be directly linked with peak performance. Modern GPU accelerators' double precision floating point (DP FLOPs) performance is 200x higher compared to DP FLOPS performance of single cores of modern CPU architectures 1 . If we were to base the GPU charging rate on the ratio between GPU peak performance and the one of a single CPU core, then we would be using a factor that high.…”
Section: B System Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CSC's Puhti node sharing accounting model discussed in previous subsection is an interesting heterogeneous model which provides a good introduction to our model. Puhti is based on Intel Xeon Gold 6230 "Cascade Lake" and NVIDIA 1 Comparing NVIDIA A100 architecture (9.7 DP TFLOPs) with AMD EPYC 64-core Milan 7763 (2.5 DP TFLOPs). 2 OLCF's Summit system achieves 74% of peak performance on High Performance Linpack benchmark [13] V100 with NVLink architectures.…”
Section: B System Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation