Visualizing Sustainability of Selective Mountain Farming Systems from Far-eastern Himalayas to Support Decision Making

Abstract

Mountain farming systems rely on both empirical and academic knowledge. Their sustainability depends on how effectively diverse knowledge is used for solution-oriented decision making. For mountains, decisions must be conducive to rural farmers whose livelihoods depend on agriculture and related activities. Adopting transdisciplinary research approach, we define a composite Sustainability Space indicator that will help decision makers better understand the ingredients for sustainability, and formulate policy and management decisions to reinforce on-the-ground sustainability. Sustainability Space was derived through analysis of the positive and negative impact factors co-defined by community and disciplinary experts, and visualized through a radar diagram. We used Principal Component Analysis to understand relationships between factors. The results on Sustainability Spaces for eight cases of farming systems from the far-Eastern Himalayas indicated that the sustainability of farming systems is strengthened if decisions holistically cater to (i) geophysical pre-requisites, (ii) ecological foundations, (iii) integrated processes and practices, (iv) resources, knowledge, and value systems, (v) stakeholders’ development and economic aspirations, (vi) well-being of farming communities, and (vii) government support mechanisms. More equitable the attention to these seven components, the higher the sustainability of farming systems in this region could be.

Bridging barriers in sustainability research: Α review from sustainability science to life cycle sustainability assessment

“…Among the other cases studies, 11 were also driven to address sustainability science concepts, showing though more deficiencies regarding the four functions. Four studies attempted to adopt a transdisciplinary research approach: Oviedo and Bursztyn ( 2016) and Shakya et al (2019) focused on local actors as carriers of knowledge about their social-ecological environment, adopting a facilitating role to aid stakeholders co-generate knowledge; Benavides et al (2019) and Lindfors et al (2019) combined stakeholder knowledge and interdisciplinary methods but limitations in time and data have limited the assessment. Eddy and Gergel (2015) emphasized the need for interdisciplinarity and criticized the mere use of LCA in SA by comparatively applying LCA and landscape ecology approaches.…”

Designing Inter- and Transdisciplinary Research on Mountains: What Place for the Unexpected?

“…The selection of an approach that appealed to these stakeholders was likewise stressed. For instance, addressing crucial aspects, such as farming (Shakya et al 2019) or livelihoods (Sheate et al 2008), and collaboratively creating tools that could help them to adapt to climate change (Del eglise et al 2019; Welling et al 2019) had a strong appeal. However, as the time needed for building contacts with stakeholders can slow the research process, flexibility by funding agencies regarding project delays was also considered to be important (H€ ochtl et al 2006).…”

Automated Sustainability Assessment System for Small and Medium Enterprises Reporting

“…The most widely used frameworks and international standards for sustainability reporting are summarized in Table 1. A number of studies [20][21][22][23][24][25][26] were also conducted.…”

“…Drawing upon the different frameworks, such as the GRI database and SAFA, as well as several papers [22][23][24][25][26] [35], a basic set of KPIs related to the economic, social and environmental dimensions can be gathered. After that, a survey of specific companies should be performed.…”