2013
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualizing short-range charge transfer at the interfaces between ferromagnetic and superconducting oxides

Abstract: The interplay between antagonistic superconductivity and ferromagnetism has been a interesting playground to explore the interaction between competing ground states. Although this effect in systems of conventional superconductors is better understood, the framework of the proximity effect at complex-oxide-based superconductor/ferromagnet interfaces is not so clear. The main difficulty originates from the lack of experimental tools capable of probing the interfaces directly with high spatial resolution. Here we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
70
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
7
70
3
Order By: Relevance
“…4) provides strong validation for the assignment of these E//a XAS pre-peaks to states in the planes and subsequently for the basic description of the cuprates as doped charge transfer insulators. This agreement is notable as our EELS of the plane layer differ markedly from the EELS of Chien et al 17 on the YBCO planes in LSMO:YBCO multilayers, which show no discernable pre-peak structure and a broad peak at B532.5 eV. The reason for these significant differences between the two studies is unclear, but they may be indicative of a difference in the basic electronic structure of YBCO in an LSMO:YBCO multilayer relative to a single crystal sample.…”
Section: Atomicallysupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4) provides strong validation for the assignment of these E//a XAS pre-peaks to states in the planes and subsequently for the basic description of the cuprates as doped charge transfer insulators. This agreement is notable as our EELS of the plane layer differ markedly from the EELS of Chien et al 17 on the YBCO planes in LSMO:YBCO multilayers, which show no discernable pre-peak structure and a broad peak at B532.5 eV. The reason for these significant differences between the two studies is unclear, but they may be indicative of a difference in the basic electronic structure of YBCO in an LSMO:YBCO multilayer relative to a single crystal sample.…”
Section: Atomicallysupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The reason for these significant differences between the two studies is unclear, but they may be indicative of a difference in the basic electronic structure of YBCO in an LSMO:YBCO multilayer relative to a single crystal sample. In contrast, the O K spectra of the chain layer, discussed below, demonstrate a better qualitative agreement between our work and Chien et al 17 , although the O doping of the sample in Chien et al 17 is not known. In the chain layer (Fig.…”
Section: Atomicallycontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the effect of charge transfer was not studied. Very recently, cross-sectional scanning tunneling microscopy measurements have suggested [22] that charge transfer takes place with a characteristic length scale of ∼1 nm. However, the interpretation of these measurements is unclear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asymmetric space charge at the upper or lower interface of a thin film will directly favor one polarization state over the other via the built-in electric field. 10,11 The origin of the space charge can be manifold, for example, trapped charges due to the presence of ferroelectrically dead layers at the interfaces, 12,13 charge-transfer [14][15][16] dipole moments at electrically asymmetric interfaces, 17,18 or migration of charged defects inside the layer by internal or external electric fields. 1,2 As an example for interface chemistry, different imprint states occur for as-grown PbZr 0.2 Ti 0.8 O 3 (PZT) deposited on either SrRuO 3 (outward, P þ ) or La 0.7 Sr 0.3 MnO 3 (inward, P À ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%