Visualizing Planetary Spectroscopy through Immersive On-site Rendering

Gold, Lauren; Bahremand, Alireza; Richards, Connor; Hertzberg, Justin; Sese, Kyle; González, A.; Purcell, Zoe; Powell, K. E.; LiKamWa, Robert

doi:10.1109/vr50410.2021.00066

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The mixed-methods study [10] employed a monitor-based set up for the lab-based elicitation, and researchers delivered google cardboard headsets to participants for the remote study. As well as using participants who owned equipment, 2 of the studies testing with HMD owners also provided some participants with headsets [23,36]. Equipment was also provided to participants in 3 other papers to aid with remote testing.…”

Section: Study Type: Remote Vs Localmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Equipment was also provided to participants in 3 other papers to aid with remote testing. Again, remote studies were mostly made up of perception studies [6,47], surveys [30,36,61], task-based applications [58,61] and interview/walkthrough-based video-conferencing sessions [10,23].…”

Section: Study Type: Remote Vs Localmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Experiments were delivered both with [14,37] and without [51] AR/VR equipment. Studies were predominantly made up of perception studies [6,47], surveys [30,36,61], task-based applications [58,61] and interview/walkthrough-based video-conferencing sessions [10,23], which were most often conducted to justify, or inform the design of an application or system. Studies which required participants to explicitly interact with an application often captured input data, i.e.…”

Section: Study Type: Remote Vs Localmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Socially Distanced: Have user evaluation methods for Immersive Technologies changed during the COVID-19 pandemic?

Spittle

Frutos-Pascual

et al. 2021

2021 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since the emergence of COVID-19 in late 2019, there has been a significant disturbance in human-to-human interaction that has changed the way we conduct user studies in the field of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), especially for extended (augmented, mixed, and virtual) reality (XR). To uncover how XR research has adapted throughout the pandemic, this paper presents a review of user study methodology adaptations from a corpus of 951 papers. This corpus of papers covers CORE 2021 A* published conference submissions, from Q2 2020 through to Q1 2021 (IEEE ISMAR, ACM CHI, IEEE VR). The review highlights how methodologies were changed and reported; sparking discussions surrounding how methods should be conveyed and to what extent research should be contextualised, by drawing on external topical factors such as COVID-19, to maximise usefulness and perspective for future studies. We provide a set of initial guidelines based on our findings, posing key considerations for researchers when reporting on user studies during uncertain and unprecedented times.

show abstract

Section: Study Type: Remote Vs Localmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Type: Remote Vs Localmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Type: Remote Vs Localmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Socially Distanced: Have user evaluation methods for Immersive Technologies changed during the COVID-19 pandemic?

Spittle

Frutos-Pascual

et al. 2021

2021 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Unraveling the Design Space of Immersive Analytics: A Systematic Review

Saffo,

Bartolomeo,

Crnovrsanin

et al. 2023

IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graphics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Different realities: a comparison of augmented and virtual reality for the sensemaking process

Lisle,

Davidson,

Gitre

et al. 2023

Front. Virtual Real.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Analysts perform sensemaking on large complex multimedia datasets in order to extract concepts, themes, and other kinds of insights from them. Immersive analytics, in particular, puts users in virtual environments that allow them to explore data in a unique way where they can interact and move through the data. Previous research using virtual reality immersive analytics tools found users wanting to refer to real-world objects or understand the physical world around them while continuing to perform their analysis. Therefore, we designed and ran a comparative study looking at the tradeoffs between virtual and augmented reality for our immersive analytics approach: Immersive Space to Think. Through two mixed-methods studies we found that virtual reality affords users a space where users can focus more on their task, but augmented reality allows them to use various real-world tools that can increase user satisfaction. In future immersive analytics tools, we recommend a blend of the two—augmented virtuality—with pass-through portals which allow users to see various real-world tools, such as whiteboards or desks and keyboards, while still giving themselves a space to focus.

show abstract

Visualizing Planetary Spectroscopy through Immersive On-site Rendering

Cited by 3 publications

References 31 publications

Socially Distanced: Have user evaluation methods for Immersive Technologies changed during the COVID-19 pandemic?

Socially Distanced: Have user evaluation methods for Immersive Technologies changed during the COVID-19 pandemic?

Unraveling the Design Space of Immersive Analytics: A Systematic Review

Different realities: a comparison of augmented and virtual reality for the sensemaking process

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About