2020
DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv.13093559.v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualizing Ligand-Mediated Bimetallic Nanocrystal Formation Pathways with In Situ Liquid Phase Transmission Electron Microscopy Synthesis

Abstract: Colloidal synthesis of alloyed multimetallic nanocrystals with precise composition control remains a challenge and a critical missing link in theory-driven rational design of functional nanomaterials. Liquid phase transmission electron microscopy (LP-TEM) enables directly visualizing nanocrystal formation mechanisms that can inform discovery of design rules for colloidal multimetallic nanocrystal synthesis, but it remains unclear whether the salient chemistry of the flask synthesis is preserved in the extreme … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33,38,39 Interestingly, the growth pathway observed after ∼45 min of fluid flow, representing intermediate concentrations of ligand and Au precursor, showed the development of a tetrahedral nanoparticle product (T d ) from the original RD (O h ) seed (Figure 1b and Movie S2), suggesting a complex interplay between thermodynamic and kinetic factors being responsible for the symmetry reduction growth mechanism. Although the precise radiolytic chemistry inside a liquid cell experiment is difficult to quantify, 25,30,40 the particle growth reactions described above were imaged using identical electron dose rates, indicating that the observed differences are better attributed to energetic arguments rather than effects of the electron beam.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33,38,39 Interestingly, the growth pathway observed after ∼45 min of fluid flow, representing intermediate concentrations of ligand and Au precursor, showed the development of a tetrahedral nanoparticle product (T d ) from the original RD (O h ) seed (Figure 1b and Movie S2), suggesting a complex interplay between thermodynamic and kinetic factors being responsible for the symmetry reduction growth mechanism. Although the precise radiolytic chemistry inside a liquid cell experiment is difficult to quantify, 25,30,40 the particle growth reactions described above were imaged using identical electron dose rates, indicating that the observed differences are better attributed to energetic arguments rather than effects of the electron beam.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several prior works by our group and others have demonstrated irreversible electron beam-induced aggregation of polymer ligand-capped nanoparticles during LP-TEM. 4,53,60 It is plausible that electron beam-induced intermolecular crosslinking and chain scission of polymer ligands will contribute to nanoparticle aggregation by reducing nanoparticle colloidal stability or covalently linking nanoparticles together. An important implication of this process is that irreversible electron beam-induced aggregation of nanoparticles is a kinetically controlled process driven by radical reactions, making it distinct from self-assembly, which is a reversible process driven by interparticle interactions.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…68 A recent study by our group showed that PEG−SH ligands act as radical scavengers for hydroxyl radicals by hydrogen abstraction from the thiol groups and PEG chain. 53 In aqueous solutions of PEG and polyacrylamide, an uncharged polymer, intermolecular and intramolecular crosslinking prevails over degradation in deoxygenated solutions while main chain scission dominates with oxygen present. 36,69,70 Therefore, the molecular structure of the ligands is important in determining the successive radiation-…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While prior work has suggested nucleation and growth as the mechanism for nanoparticle growth, there is a growing body of literature suggesting alternative mechanisms. Some researchers have suggested metal nanoparticle formation is simply controlled by precursor reduction reaction kinetics, 31 while others have suggested non-classical crystallization mechanisms, 32 including aggregative growth, [33][34][35][36][37][38] liquidliquid phase separation, 39 and prenucleation clusters, [40][41][42][43] underlie the formation of metal nanoparticles during solution phase synthesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%