2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-88606-8_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualizing Lagrangian Coherent Structures and Comparison to Vector Field Topology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has be shown that in the case of finite Lyapunov exponent ridges, this leads to significant, consistent, and reliable visualizations. 16 …”
Section: Lcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has be shown that in the case of finite Lyapunov exponent ridges, this leads to significant, consistent, and reliable visualizations. 16 …”
Section: Lcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by Goldhirsch et al in 1987 [8] for measuring predictability, see Yoden et al [30] for details. For steady vector fields LCS is comparable to vector field topology [9], although it tends to convey more information [25]. However, LCS is still well defined and interpretable for unsteady vector fields due to its Lagrangian definition, whereas classical vector field topology is only able to give an instantaneous view, except for the approaches by Theisel et al [29] and Shi et al [27] based on path lines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Here some filtering criteria for ridges are recapitulated, and discussed in the context of adaptive ridge extraction, that have already been presented in [25] for ridge extraction in FTLE fields.…”
Section: Ridge Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations