2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualizing in deceased COVID-19 patients how SARS-CoV-2 attacks the respiratory and olfactory mucosae but spares the olfactory bulb

Abstract: Anosmia, the loss of smell, is a common and often the sole symptom of COVID-19. The onset of the sequence of pathobiological events leading to olfactory dysfunction remains obscure. Here, we have developed a postmortem bedside surgical procedure to harvest endoscopically samples of respiratory and olfactory mucosae and whole olfactory bulbs. Our cohort of 85 cases included COVID-19 patients who died a few days after infection with SARS-CoV-2, enabling us to catch the virus while it was still replicating. We fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

21
298
4
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 271 publications
(327 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
(81 reference statements)
21
298
4
4
Order By: Relevance
“…De Malo et al showed that the olfactory bulb is a conduit for viral entry into the brain [ 21 , 27 ]; thus, persistence of the virus in the olfactory bulb could explain the persistence of smell alteration. Other data are conflicting; Khan et al found that virus can affect the neuroepithelium without spreading into the olfactory bulbs [ 28 ]; however, the authors did not mention whether the patients suffered (or not) of smell disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Malo et al showed that the olfactory bulb is a conduit for viral entry into the brain [ 21 , 27 ]; thus, persistence of the virus in the olfactory bulb could explain the persistence of smell alteration. Other data are conflicting; Khan et al found that virus can affect the neuroepithelium without spreading into the olfactory bulbs [ 28 ]; however, the authors did not mention whether the patients suffered (or not) of smell disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…greater than 2 weeks 34 ) may bias towards analysis after virus is cleared. Human biopsies are also limited in their sample size and may miss important sites of infection-an explanation for negative findings supported by the fact that SARS-CoV-2 could not be detected in nasal epithelium or brain in more than half of individuals examined by a recent negative study 51 . In contrast, thorough examination of whole nasal cavity and brain from mice infected with a measured amount of virus at a known timepoints during a highly reproducible disease course enables detection of even transiently infected tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, SARS-CoV-2 neuronal infection has been refuted by prominent studies that failed to identify virus in the brains of deceased patients using methods such as single nuclear RNA sequencing 34 or RNA in situ hybridization and immunostaining of olfactory bulb neurons 51 . If infection of the OE and neighboring brain are associated with lethal COVID-19 disease, why is SARS-CoV-2 virus detected in human brain samples by some but not all investigators?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inoculation of human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC)-derived brain organoids with SARS-CoV-2 revealed absent or mostly abortive infection of neurons and/or astrocytes, pointing towards the notion of limited neurotropism and replication in the CNS of SARS-CoV-2 ( Ramani et al, 2021 ). The frequent loss of smell and the high viral load in the olfactory epithelium of COVID-19 patients ( Meinhardt et al, 2021 ) brought the CNS entry route via axons of the olfactory receptor cells into focus, but this has not been confirmed ( Khan et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Sars-cov-2mentioning
confidence: 99%