Visualizing Gait Patterns of Able bodied Individuals and Transtibial Amputees with the Use of Accelerometry in Smart Phones

Teknomo, Kardi; Estuar, Maria Regina Justina E.

doi:10.15446/rce.v37n2spe.47951

Cited by 7 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While research has often focused on the enhancement of existing static visualization tools, such as violin plots to express both density and distribution of data (Marmolejo-Ramos and Matsunaga, 2009), these remain limited due to their static nature. Specifically, static visualizations become exponentially more difficult to understand as the complexity of the content they aim to display increases (e.g., Teknomo and Estuar, 2014).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Frequently, a large number of variables for each data point are available for a small number of cases that will often not fulfill the assumptions required for traditional linear tests (e.g., in offender profiling; Canter and Heritage, 1990s). Finally, with the introduction of mobile technology, applied field-research has the capacity to produce very large data sets through the use of mobile applications (e.g., in identifying friendship networks; Eagle et al, 2009; or displaying individual gait patterns; Teknomo and Estuar, 2014). However, both very small and very large data sets provide a challenge for standard linear representations and testing (Rothman, 1990), which we argue can in-part be compensated for with the use of dynamic data visualizations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Research Methods Pedagogy: Engaging Psychology Students in Research Methods and Statistics

Roberts¹

2016

Frontiers Research Topics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Frontiers is more than just an open-access publisher of scholarly articles: it is a pioneering approach to the world of academia, radically improving the way scholarly research is managed. The grand vision of Frontiers is a world where all people have an equal opportunity to seek, share and generate knowledge. Frontiers provides immediate and permanent online open access to all its publications, but this alone is not enough to realize our grand goals. Frontiers Journal Series The Frontiers Journal Series is a multi-tier and interdisciplinary set of open-access, online journals, promising a paradigm shift from the current review, selection and dissemination processes in academic publishing. All Frontiers journals are driven by researchers for researchers; therefore, they constitute a service to the scholarly community. At the same time, the Frontiers Journal Series operates on a revolutionary invention, the tiered publishing system, initially addressing specific communities of scholars, and gradually climbing up to broader public understanding, thus serving the interests of the lay society, too. Dedication to Quality Each Frontiers article is a landmark of the highest quality, thanks to genuinely collaborative interactions between authors and review editors, who include some of the world's best academicians. Research must be certified by peers before entering a stream of knowledge that may eventually reach the public-and shape society; therefore, Frontiers only applies the most rigorous and unbiased reviews. Frontiers revolutionizes research publishing by freely delivering the most outstanding research, evaluated with no bias from both the academic and social point of view. By applying the most advanced information technologies, Frontiers is catapulting scholarly publishing into a new generation. What are Frontiers Research Topics? Frontiers Research Topics are very popular trademarks of the Frontiers Journals Series: they are collections of at least ten articles, all centered on a particular subject. With their unique mix of varied contributions from Original Research to Review Articles, Frontiers Research Topics unify the most influential researchers, the latest key findings and historical advances in a hot research area! Find out more on how to host your own Frontiers Research Topic or contribute to one as an author by contacting the Frontiers Editorial

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research Methods Pedagogy: Engaging Psychology Students in Research Methods and Statistics

Roberts¹

2016

Frontiers Research Topics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…29 The 13 papers on developing or validating actimeters, algorithms or scores for activity classification with lowerlimb prosthesis users mainly focused on development of sensors for monitoring activity. 34,35,37,39,97 However, they also included development of smart-phone software to monitor falls 40 or visualise gait, 98 and papers on comparing sensors, 31,99 validating sensors 38 and validating classification methods. 30 In the case of upper-limb studies, three papers related to the development of algorithms for the assessment of activity.…”

Section: Figure 1 Flow Chart Of Selection and Sorting Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Technology for monitoring everyday prosthesis use: a systematic review

Chadwell¹,

Diment²,

Amigo³

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundUnderstanding how prostheses are used in everyday life is central to the design, provision and evaluation of prosthetic devices and associated services. This paper reviews the scientific literature on methodologies and technologies that have been used to assess the daily use of both upper- and lower-limb prostheses. It discusses the types of studies that have been undertaken, the technologies used to monitor physical activity, the benefits of monitoring daily living and the barriers to long-term monitoring.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL and EMBASE of studies that monitored the activity of prosthesis-users during daily-living.Results60 lower-limb studies and 9 upper-limb studies were identified for inclusion in the review. The first studies in the lower-limb field date from the 1990s and the number has increased steadily since the early 2000s. In contrast, the studies in the upper-limb field have only begun to emerge over the past few years. The early lower-limb studies focused on the development or validation of actimeters, algorithms and/or scores for activity classification. However, most of the recent lower-limb studies used activity monitoring to compare prosthetic components. The lower-limb studies mainly used step-counts as their only measure of activity, focusing on the amount of activity, not the type and quality of movements. In comparison, the small number of upper-limb studies were fairly evenly spread between development of algorithms, comparison of everyday activity to clinical scores, and comparison of different prosthesis user populations. Most upper-limb papers reported the degree of symmetry in activity levels between the arm with the prosthesis and the intact arm.ConclusionsActivity monitoring technology used in conjunction with clinical scores and user feedback, offers significant insights into how prostheses are used and whether they meet the user’s requirements. However, the cost, limited battery-life and lack of availability in many countries mean that using sensors to understand the daily use of prostheses and the types of activity being performed has not yet become a feasible standard clinical practice. This review provides recommendations for the research and clinical communities to advance this area for the benefit of prosthesis users.

show abstract

“…Static visualisations typically become exponentially more difficult to understand as the complexity of the content they aim to display increases (Teknomo & Estuar, 2014). However, with careful management, dynamic data visualisations can provide a data format that is more accessible for a variety of user groups including other researchers, practitioners, interested members of the public, and students.…”

Section: Into the Cloud: Generating Impact With Digital Dashboardsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The visualisation of data in a digital context

Ellis¹,

Merdian²

2018

Doing Research in and on the Digital

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Visualizing Gait Patterns of Able bodied Individuals and Transtibial Amputees with the Use of Accelerometry in Smart Phones

Cited by 7 publications

References 13 publications

Research Methods Pedagogy: Engaging Psychology Students in Research Methods and Statistics

Research Methods Pedagogy: Engaging Psychology Students in Research Methods and Statistics

Technology for monitoring everyday prosthesis use: a systematic review

The visualisation of data in a digital context

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About