2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1402-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualizing electrostatic gating effects in two-dimensional heterostructures

Abstract: The ability to directly observe electronic band structure in modern nanoscale field-effect devices could transform understanding of their physics and function. One could, for example, visualize local changes in the electrical and chemical potentials as a gate voltage is applied. One could also study intriguing physical phenomena such as electrically induced topological transitions and many-body spectral reconstructions. Here we show that submicron angle-resolved photoemission (-ARPES) applied to two-dimension… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
154
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(66 reference statements)
21
154
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy difference ΔE ΓK reported in Table I from ARPES measurements is consistent with having only the K valley occupied upon accumulation of a density of holes reaching up to about 5 × 10 13 cm −2 [64,75,76]. Similarly, although no sufficiently systematic ARPES study of the conduction band of monolayer TMDs has been reported yet, analogous measurements on the doped surface of the bulk [77] (where doping should be limited to the first few layers) or monolayer [60] WSe 2 have shown that it is relatively easy to populate both the K and Q valleys in the conduction band (i.e., ΔE KQ in monolayer WSe 2 is significantly smaller than ΔE ΓK ; see Table I). Moreover, the observation of a larger softening in W-based monolayers, associated with the K and Q valleys being closer in WS 2 and WSe 2 than in MoS 2 , is compatible with the fact that ΔE KQ is largely controlled by spin-orbit coupling (which is stronger in W-based compounds).…”
Section: Theoretical Analysissupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The energy difference ΔE ΓK reported in Table I from ARPES measurements is consistent with having only the K valley occupied upon accumulation of a density of holes reaching up to about 5 × 10 13 cm −2 [64,75,76]. Similarly, although no sufficiently systematic ARPES study of the conduction band of monolayer TMDs has been reported yet, analogous measurements on the doped surface of the bulk [77] (where doping should be limited to the first few layers) or monolayer [60] WSe 2 have shown that it is relatively easy to populate both the K and Q valleys in the conduction band (i.e., ΔE KQ in monolayer WSe 2 is significantly smaller than ΔE ΓK ; see Table I). Moreover, the observation of a larger softening in W-based monolayers, associated with the K and Q valleys being closer in WS 2 and WSe 2 than in MoS 2 , is compatible with the fact that ΔE KQ is largely controlled by spin-orbit coupling (which is stronger in W-based compounds).…”
Section: Theoretical Analysissupporting
confidence: 67%
“…We conclude that k-direct interlayer transitions at Γ are robust processes, as we have shown them to occur irrespective of the relative orientation of the multilayers forming the interface (in the majority of cases we did not align the crystals when assembling the structures), of a substantial lattice constant mismatch (approximatively 15 %) between the constituents, and despite the fact that the band structure of TMD multilayers changes significantly upon varying their thickness. Besides substantiating our initial strategy to engineer systems for broad-spectrum optoelectronics, the ability to detect interlayer transitions in [39] (the energy difference is at most a few tens of meV, which we neglect here), we can use the k-direct, 2.0 eV intralayer transition at K in 2L-WS 2 to determine the energy of the maximum at K of the valence band of 2L-WS 2 . The relative alignment of all relevant band edges in 2L-InSe and 2L-WS 2 is then entirely determined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Finally, by combining the results for n and E D for each layer as shown in Figure 1i we find that in both cases E D scales with doping as n, confirming the isolated graphene-like behavior in each cone. [32,33] We now turn our focus towards the key features of the superlattice dispersion at zero gate voltage before we return to the electrostatic tunability of these features. , where…”
Section: Doi: 101002/adma202001656mentioning
confidence: 99%