2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-02628-8_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualizing Convolutional Networks for MRI-Based Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract: Visualizing and interpreting convolutional neural networks (CNNs) is an important task to increase trust in automatic medical decision making systems. In this study, we train a 3D CNN to detect Alzheimer's disease based on structural MRI scans of the brain. Then, we apply four different gradient-based and occlusion-based visualization methods that explain the network's classification decisions by highlighting relevant areas in the input image. We compare the methods qualitatively and quantitatively. We find th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They demonstrate that these different visualization methods capture different aspects of the data and show high variability depending e.g., on the resolution of the convolutional layers. In Rieke et al (2018), gradient-based and occlusion methods (standard patch occlusion and brain area occlusion) were qualitatively and quantitatively compared for AD classification. High regional overlaps between the methods, mostly inferior and middle temporal gyrus, were found but for gradient-based methods the importance was more widely distributed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They demonstrate that these different visualization methods capture different aspects of the data and show high variability depending e.g., on the resolution of the convolutional layers. In Rieke et al (2018), gradient-based and occlusion methods (standard patch occlusion and brain area occlusion) were qualitatively and quantitatively compared for AD classification. High regional overlaps between the methods, mostly inferior and middle temporal gyrus, were found but for gradient-based methods the importance was more widely distributed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To analyze the relevance in different brain areas according to the Scalable Brain Atlas by Neuromorphometrics Inc. (Bakker et al, 2015), we suggest size-corrected metrics and compared these metrics between LRP and guided backpropagation. We have chosen guided backpropagation as a baseline method because (1) sensitivity analysis is the most common method for generating heatmaps, (2) it results in more focused heatmaps compared to only using backpropagation (Rieke et al, 2018) and (3) it is better comparable to LRP than occlusion methods with respect to our relevance measures. On an individual level, we analyzed the heatmap patterns of single subjects (“relevance fingerprinting”) and correlate them with the hippocampal volume as a key biomarker of AD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides understanding diagnostic decisions for individual patients, heatmaps might be useful in validating CNN models. Recently, we have shown the potential of transparent CNN applications for knowledge discovery in Alzheimer's disease (Rieke et al, 2018; Böhle et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to better understand what our model is analyzing in brain images and how it is done, we experimented with a number of visualization approaches, considering the most used techniques in accountable machine learning for neural networks. Some of these approaches were also recently explored by Rieke et al (2018).…”
Section: Accountabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%