Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Four machine learning methods, i.e., self-organizing map (SOM), Gaussian mixture model (GMM), eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and contrastive learning (CL), are used to detect the irrotational boundary (IB), which represents the outer edge of the turbulent and non-turbulent interface layer. To accurately evaluate the detection methods, high-resolution databases from direct numerical simulations of a temporally evolving turbulent plane jet are used. It is found that except for the SOM method, the general contour of the IB appears to be effectively captured using the GMM, XGBoost, and CL methods, which indicate the turbulent and non-turbulent regions can be roughly recognized. Furthermore, the intrinsic features of the detected IB using the GMM, XGBoost, and the CL methods are quantitatively evaluated. Unlike the conventional vorticity norm method, the three machine learning methods do not rely on a single threshold of vorticity magnitude to separate the turbulent and non-turbulent regions. A small part of the detected IB using the three machine learning methods is characterized by the rotational motions, which are expected to be only found inside the turbulent sublayer and turbulent core region. Compared to the vorticity norm and XGBoost methods, the fractal dimensions of the IB detected by the GMM and CL methods are relatively small, which are related to the missing detection of some highly contorted elements. With the three machine learning methods, a large part of the detected IB is characterized by a convex shape, similarly as with the vorticity norm. However, the probability density function profiles of the local curvature of the detected IB differ greatly between the three machine learning methods and the vorticity norm. A mild variation of the mean conditional distributions of the vorticity magnitude can be observed across the detected IB by the three machine learning methods. This study first implies that using the machine learning methods the turbulent and non-turbulent regions can be roughly distinguished, but it is still challenging to obtain the intrinsic features of the detected IB.
Four machine learning methods, i.e., self-organizing map (SOM), Gaussian mixture model (GMM), eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and contrastive learning (CL), are used to detect the irrotational boundary (IB), which represents the outer edge of the turbulent and non-turbulent interface layer. To accurately evaluate the detection methods, high-resolution databases from direct numerical simulations of a temporally evolving turbulent plane jet are used. It is found that except for the SOM method, the general contour of the IB appears to be effectively captured using the GMM, XGBoost, and CL methods, which indicate the turbulent and non-turbulent regions can be roughly recognized. Furthermore, the intrinsic features of the detected IB using the GMM, XGBoost, and the CL methods are quantitatively evaluated. Unlike the conventional vorticity norm method, the three machine learning methods do not rely on a single threshold of vorticity magnitude to separate the turbulent and non-turbulent regions. A small part of the detected IB using the three machine learning methods is characterized by the rotational motions, which are expected to be only found inside the turbulent sublayer and turbulent core region. Compared to the vorticity norm and XGBoost methods, the fractal dimensions of the IB detected by the GMM and CL methods are relatively small, which are related to the missing detection of some highly contorted elements. With the three machine learning methods, a large part of the detected IB is characterized by a convex shape, similarly as with the vorticity norm. However, the probability density function profiles of the local curvature of the detected IB differ greatly between the three machine learning methods and the vorticity norm. A mild variation of the mean conditional distributions of the vorticity magnitude can be observed across the detected IB by the three machine learning methods. This study first implies that using the machine learning methods the turbulent and non-turbulent regions can be roughly distinguished, but it is still challenging to obtain the intrinsic features of the detected IB.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.