2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualization of the Evolution of the Fracture Process Zone in Sandstone by Transmission Computed Radiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, since the FPZ is essentially a non-linear three-dimensional region, it is imperative that a method capable of assessing the volumetric FPZ characteristics has to be employed to ensure the sufficient reliability and repeatability of the results. We have already shown in a paper by Vavro et al that a time-lapse high-resolution micro-tomography under three-point bending load conditions (a 4D micro-CT) provides sufficient insight into the crack formation process and the FPZ evolution mechanisms [3]. Additionally, we have demonstrated that the modification of the standard flexural arrangements into the four-point bending of a vertically oriented specimen brings significant advantages of the in-situ experiments in terms of uniform X-ray attenuation during tomographic scanning, improved resolution around the stress-concentrators, and the possibility to enhance the loading device mechanically, so that it is possible to perform intermittent loading with an arbitrary number of tomographic scans throughout the force-displacement (P-d) curve of the material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the FPZ is essentially a non-linear three-dimensional region, it is imperative that a method capable of assessing the volumetric FPZ characteristics has to be employed to ensure the sufficient reliability and repeatability of the results. We have already shown in a paper by Vavro et al that a time-lapse high-resolution micro-tomography under three-point bending load conditions (a 4D micro-CT) provides sufficient insight into the crack formation process and the FPZ evolution mechanisms [3]. Additionally, we have demonstrated that the modification of the standard flexural arrangements into the four-point bending of a vertically oriented specimen brings significant advantages of the in-situ experiments in terms of uniform X-ray attenuation during tomographic scanning, improved resolution around the stress-concentrators, and the possibility to enhance the loading device mechanically, so that it is possible to perform intermittent loading with an arbitrary number of tomographic scans throughout the force-displacement (P-d) curve of the material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is equipped with an X-ray flat panel detector having a number of 2,000  2,000 pixels with a pixel size of 200 μm. The basic technical parameters of the XT H 225 ST inspection machine are given, for example, in [17]. The scanning parameters were as follows: a reflection target, 160 kV voltage, 126 μA current, 0.5 mm thick aluminium filter, 3,141 projections with two images per projection, 1,000 ms exposition, a scanning time of ca.…”
Section: X-ray Ct Imaging Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research [17], [18] has focussed on the study of the crack propagation processes in quasi-brittle materials, such as silica-based composites or sandstones; these have shown some limitations when the conventional three-point bending tests were used in combination with the X-ray CT technique. The main disadvantage of such an arrangement of the experiment can be seen in particular in the horizontal orientation of the sample perpendicular to the rotational axis of the CT scanner, which, together with the loading supports covering parts of the radiograms (see Figure 1A) significantly reduces the quality of the acquired data.…”
Section: Loading Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept for 4D micro-CT of the bending experiments was developed based on experience from measurements presented in [12,13], where conventional three-point bending tests (see fig. 2 left) were employed.…”
Section: Loading Devicementioning
confidence: 99%