2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualization of the electrical activity of the cauda equina using a magnetospinography system in healthy subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 140 Pilot studies have demonstrated that MSG can quantify and visualize electrical conduction through the cervical cord, cauda equina, and peripheral nerves. 141 , 142 It was also demonstrated that MSG identified the site of dorsal column conduction block in one patient with DCM. 141 However, the utility of this technology may be limited by issues of physiological noise and movement, which are minimized in MEG by the closer proximity of the brain to the skin surface and by placing the head in a tight-fitting helmet.…”
Section: Electrophysiology Of the Spinal Cordmentioning
confidence: 95%
“… 140 Pilot studies have demonstrated that MSG can quantify and visualize electrical conduction through the cervical cord, cauda equina, and peripheral nerves. 141 , 142 It was also demonstrated that MSG identified the site of dorsal column conduction block in one patient with DCM. 141 However, the utility of this technology may be limited by issues of physiological noise and movement, which are minimized in MEG by the closer proximity of the brain to the skin surface and by placing the head in a tight-fitting helmet.…”
Section: Electrophysiology Of the Spinal Cordmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Studies have found that evoked electrophysiological activities can be detected though MSG and MNG in various locations along the spinal cord. This indicates the potential of using MSG and MNG as a noninvasive tool for visualizing neural activity in the cauda equina [162], examining lumbar diseases [162], localizing lesion site in the lumbar canal [163], diagnosing conduction block even at the site of spinal stenosis in cervical myelopathy patients [164]- [166], detecting spinal root and dorsal horn dysfunction [166], visualizing ulnar nerve stimulation at spinal tracts at C5/6/7 [167], and measuring neural activity in the dorsal column and dorsal horn in the cervical cord [168] [10]) are examples of evoked MNG and MSG where each spike in the waveform is followed by the applied stimuli. The time difference between the applied stimuli and the appearance of the spike is called the peak latency.…”
Section: Magnetoneurography (Mng) and Magnetospinography (Msg)mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…These limitations are overcome with magnetospinography (MSG) which uses superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) to detect the magnetic field generated by the spinal cord [22][23][24][25][26] . The magnetic fields detected with MSG are not as distorted by the tissue surrounding the spinal cord or muscle artefacts, meaning source analysis is more reliable 23,27 .…”
Section: Current Measures Of Spinal Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%