1995
DOI: 10.1002/gcc.2870120409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualization of INT2 and HST1 Amplification in oral squamous cell carcinomas

Abstract: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) develops along a multistep genetic pathway including loss of tumor suppressor genes and alteration of oncogenes. We characterized seven OSCC cell lines by classical and molecular cytogenetic analysis and fresh tumor and adjacent oral mucosa corresponding to three of the cell lines by molecular cytogenetics. We observed homogeneously staining regions (hsrs) in four of the seven cell lines, at 11q13 in three and at 11q23 and in an unidentified marker chromosome in the fourth. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
0
5

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
50
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the early speci®c genetic changes previously described involve mutations, deletions, loss of heterozygosity and chromosomal rearrangements. In contrast, the timing of gene ampli®cation is less well understood and several studies have suggested that proto-oncogene amplification is observed late in the progression of many tumors (reviewed in Brison, 1993;Lese et al, 1995). This has been supported, in the past, by the in vitro-derived notion that permissiveness for ampli®cation requires the disruption of several checkpoint mechanisms, often a hallmark of transformed cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the early speci®c genetic changes previously described involve mutations, deletions, loss of heterozygosity and chromosomal rearrangements. In contrast, the timing of gene ampli®cation is less well understood and several studies have suggested that proto-oncogene amplification is observed late in the progression of many tumors (reviewed in Brison, 1993;Lese et al, 1995). This has been supported, in the past, by the in vitro-derived notion that permissiveness for ampli®cation requires the disruption of several checkpoint mechanisms, often a hallmark of transformed cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), i(3)(q10), −4,+del (5)(p11),+del(6)(q21), der(7)t(7;13)(q11;q11),+der(7)t(7;?)q11;? ),i(8)(q10), −9, −10,add(11)(p14),+del(11) (q14), −13, −13, −14,der (14) 4 65~80<3n>,XX,-X,+del(1)(p34.1),del(3)(p21),+del(3)(p21),del(4)(p14),+del(4)(p14),+6, +del(7)(q32)x2, −8,+9 [8],9 [7], −10, −11,hsr(11)(q13)x2,der(13)t(8;13)(q11;p11)x2, +der (13) 10 103~129<5N>,XX,-X,-X,-X,+1,+2,del(3)(p13), −4, −5,i(5)(p10)x2,+7,+del(7)(q22)x2, −8, −8, i(8)(q10)x2, −9, −9,i(9)(q10),+10,+del(10)(q23)x2,+11,+der(11)(pter→q13::hsr::q14→q25:: hsr::? )x2, −13,+14,+der (14)t(11;14)(q11;p11)x2, −15, −16, −16, −16,-17,del(17)(p11)x2, −18, +20,+20,+20, −21, −22, −22, −22, +2mar1,+2mar2,1~3dmin[cs11]/58~63,X,-X,-X, −2, −3, −4,i(5)(p10)x2, −6,+del(7)(q22), −8, −8,i(8)(q10), −9,i(9)(q10),+10,+del(10)(q23),der(11)(pter→q13::hsr:: q14→q25::hsr::?…”
Section: Supplementary Materialsunclassified
“…The oropharynx included sites involving the base of tongue, soft palate, tonsil and overlapping lesions of the oral cavity and pharynx. Analyses of TP53 mutation status (Law et al, 1995) and (Gollin et al, unpublished data), p16 immunohistochemistry (unpublished data) and 11q13 amp (Shuster et al, 2000;Lese et al, 1995) were performed in earlier unpublished studies unless otherwise noted. Briefly, TP53 mutation status was determined by automated sequencing of exons 5 -8, p16 immunohistochemistry was performed on paraffin sections of formaldehydefixed tissue using a monoclonal antibody to full length human p16 protein (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA, USA).…”
Section: Head and Neck Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common genetic alterations in HNSCC involve TP53, CDKN2A/p16 and chromosomal band 11q13. Amplification of 11q13 is among the most common sites of gene amplification, observed in a number of cancers (Schraml et al, 1999), and in approximately 45% of HNSCC (Lese et al, 1995;Schuuring, 1995;Gollin, 2001). A number of putative oncogenes map to this region; among them, CCND1 (cyclin D1) is thought to play a role in tumorigenesis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%