2008 Requirements Engineering Visualization 2008
DOI: 10.1109/rev.2008.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualization of Feature Survival in Platform-Based Embedded Systems Development for Improved Understanding of Scope Dynamics

Abstract: This paper presents a method for visualizing the scoping process in platform-based development of embedded systems. The proposed visualization shows the decision process of including or excluding features that are candidates for the next release. The presented visualization charts are evaluated in a large-size embedded system platform project. The evaluation indicates that the visualization of feature survival and scope dynamics can improve the understanding of the decision process of platform scoping in real … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(16 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a remedy, the Feature Survival Chart (FSC) concept was proposed by the authors and acknowledged by the practitioners as a valuable support. This paper extends the contributions of [3] with (1) findings from industrial application in three projects and (2) scope tracking measurements. The proposed visualization shows the decision process of including or excluding features that are candidates for the next release.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…As a remedy, the Feature Survival Chart (FSC) concept was proposed by the authors and acknowledged by the practitioners as a valuable support. This paper extends the contributions of [3] with (1) findings from industrial application in three projects and (2) scope tracking measurements. The proposed visualization shows the decision process of including or excluding features that are candidates for the next release.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In software projects, modifications are considered agreed upon scope of the project. These modifications are due [5] Agile EVM [26] Burn-down charts [46] Burn-up charts [46] Function Points [48] Work-Breakdown Structure [49] Expert judgement [51] Performance analysis [52] Feature Transition Charts [53] Story Mapping [54] Stakeholder analysis [55] Benefit analysis [56] Requirement Matrix [56] Scope Change Control System [57] Functional Size Measurement (FSM) [58] Feature Survival Charts [59] Feature Growth Charts [60] SPSRI [61] Activity Based (top down) [62]- [63] Task based (bottom up) [62]- [63] PERT [64] Object point [65] Source line of code (SLOC) [65] Analogy technique [65] Price-to-win [62] VOLUME , 2020 to inevitable change and complexity of the project scope. According to [50] author "Half of the system requirements change till deployment".…”
Section: B Scope Definition Techniques/toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes these charts effective at executing plans with minimal confusion [5]. Similarly, Wnuk et al explored how one can represent feature life cycles in a two dimensional graph [23]. Kanban visualizes workflow of a development team [2].…”
Section: Visualizations For General Software Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bar graphs, line graphs, etc.) [3,23], these are typically focused on simple bivariate relationships, unable to depict the complex, multivariate relationships inherent in release planning. Several researchers have explored using different visual representations to support release planning.…”
Section: Visualizations For Release Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%