2022
DOI: 10.1002/cem.3435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualization of confusion matrices with network graphs

Abstract: The use of network analysis as a means of visualizing the off-diagonal (misclassified) elements of a confusion matrix is demonstrated, and the potential to use the network graphs as a guide for developing hierarchical classification models is presented. A very brief summary of graph theory is described. This is followed by an explanation and code with examples of how these networks can then be used for visualization of confusion matrices. The use of network graphs to provide insight into differing model perfor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we confirm the enhancement in class-specific accuracy achieved by the geological borehole image recognition database. To compare the results of the two databases in the aforementioned classification models, we employed a widely used indicator in statistical classification problems, namely the confusion matrix [44]. Figure 19 shows the confusion matrix comparisons for the border images (Bi), fracture images (Fi), and intact rock images (Irmi).…”
Section: Analysis Of Image Recognition Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we confirm the enhancement in class-specific accuracy achieved by the geological borehole image recognition database. To compare the results of the two databases in the aforementioned classification models, we employed a widely used indicator in statistical classification problems, namely the confusion matrix [44]. Figure 19 shows the confusion matrix comparisons for the border images (Bi), fracture images (Fi), and intact rock images (Irmi).…”
Section: Analysis Of Image Recognition Performancementioning
confidence: 99%