2014
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1307824111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualization and quantification of nascent RAD51 filament formation at single-monomer resolution

Abstract: During recombinational repair of double-stranded DNA breaks, RAD51 recombinase assembles as a nucleoprotein filament around single-stranded DNA to form a catalytically proficient structure able to promote homology recognition and strand exchange. Mediators and accessory factors guide the action and control the dynamics of RAD51 filaments. Elucidation of these control mechanisms necessitates development of approaches to quantitatively probe transient aspects of RAD51 filament dynamics. Here, we combine fluoresc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

23
87
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(65 reference statements)
23
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed disassembly rates of (14 ± 2) 10 −4  s −1 (at 5 pN; N  = 8; dissociation rates are obtained from exponential fits to the fluorescence intensity traces, errors are fitting errors), (15 ± 1) 10 −4  s −1 (at 20 pN; N  = 16) and (12 ± 1) 10 −4  s −1 (at 50 pN; N  = 4) show that hRAD51 dissociation from ssDNA is not influenced by tension within the range of values tested. Interestingly, a similar effect was reported previously (Candelli et al , 2014) for the assembly process: both nucleation and growth of hRAD51 NPFs are highly tension‐dependent for dsDNA, but independent of tension for ssDNA. This finding can be attributed to the fact that dsDNA is more rigid and resistant to length change (King et al , 2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observed disassembly rates of (14 ± 2) 10 −4  s −1 (at 5 pN; N  = 8; dissociation rates are obtained from exponential fits to the fluorescence intensity traces, errors are fitting errors), (15 ± 1) 10 −4  s −1 (at 20 pN; N  = 16) and (12 ± 1) 10 −4  s −1 (at 50 pN; N  = 4) show that hRAD51 dissociation from ssDNA is not influenced by tension within the range of values tested. Interestingly, a similar effect was reported previously (Candelli et al , 2014) for the assembly process: both nucleation and growth of hRAD51 NPFs are highly tension‐dependent for dsDNA, but independent of tension for ssDNA. This finding can be attributed to the fact that dsDNA is more rigid and resistant to length change (King et al , 2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Our previous single‐molecule work on the interaction of hRAD51 with ssDNA focused mainly on the assembly of the NPF (Candelli et al , 2014) and on the disassembly of hRAD51 from double‐stranded DNA (dsDNA; van Mameren et al , 2009b). The latter study showed that hRAD51 disassembles through a pause–burst mechanism from NPF ends, dominated by ATP hydrolysis of the RAD51 monomers at filament ends.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, potentially less stable or more dynamic nucleoprotein filaments may be more effective at overcoming barriers, migrating joint molecules, and thereby completing the DNA strand exchange reaction. RAD51 nucleoprotein filaments were previously shown to grow from heterogeneous nuclei ranging in size from dimers, and even monomers, to large oligomers (54). Using smTIRFM, we were able to follow the formation kinetics of these nuclei at a singlemonomer resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Rad51/RecA family recombinases assemble through a well-defined pathway involving a rate limiting nucleation step, followed by more rapid spreading along the DNA (45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53). Within the context of this model, we can consider two possible mechanisms that might led to segregated Rad51 and Dmc1 filaments ( Figure 6A,B).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%