1998
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0053503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualisation of executable formal specifications for user validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, [40] and [32] present an execution and animation framework for specifications in Z, whereas [22] does so for the language Albert II. In addition to being nonsequence-based design models and not having a play-inlike capability, the animation in these tools does not use the target application GUI.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, [40] and [32] present an execution and animation framework for specifications in Z, whereas [22] does so for the language Albert II. In addition to being nonsequence-based design models and not having a play-inlike capability, the animation in these tools does not use the target application GUI.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%