2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-11514-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualisation of dCas9 target search in vivo using an open-microscopy framework

Abstract: CRISPR-Cas9 is widely used in genomic editing, but the kinetics of target search and its relation to the cellular concentration of Cas9 have remained elusive. Effective target search requires constant screening of the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) and a 30 ms upper limit for screening was recently found. To further quantify the rapid switching between DNA-bound and freely-diffusing states of dCas9, we developed an open-microscopy framework, the miCube, and introduce Monte-Carlo diffusion distribution analys… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
130
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
9
130
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cascade was suggested to spend approximately 50% of its search time on DNA and the rest distributed in the cytoplasm, however, the impact of phage infection and Cas3 localization have not determined. Similar binding kinetics have also been suggested for Cas9 expressed in E. coli and Lactococcus lactis (Jones et al, 2017;Martens et al, 2019). Thus, unlike other DNA interacting proteins like LacI, which spends 90% of its time in the DNA (Elf et al, 2007), these CRISPR-Cas complexes exhibit dynamic association-dissociation kinetics potentially for rapid target identification (Vink et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Cascade was suggested to spend approximately 50% of its search time on DNA and the rest distributed in the cytoplasm, however, the impact of phage infection and Cas3 localization have not determined. Similar binding kinetics have also been suggested for Cas9 expressed in E. coli and Lactococcus lactis (Jones et al, 2017;Martens et al, 2019). Thus, unlike other DNA interacting proteins like LacI, which spends 90% of its time in the DNA (Elf et al, 2007), these CRISPR-Cas complexes exhibit dynamic association-dissociation kinetics potentially for rapid target identification (Vink et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…That is excellent for sensors and logic gates, but we show a time-varying system that fluctuates between on/off reporter states in an analog manner. In addition, our characterization method is one of the first examples of single-cell analysis of a dCas9 or dCas12a circuit in bacteria (Jones et al 2017, Martens et al 2019, Camsund et al 2020. We also use our setup to explicitly measure single-cell dCas9-sgRNA and dCas12a-crRNA repression times in thousands of individual cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to other simulation-based frameworks for estimating transition rates [48][49][50] , anaDDA holds several advantages. First, the distributions of simulations are not exact as they are generated from a limited number of particles and therefore do not allow for using an MLE approach, which requires convergence based on exact probability even for small changes in the parameter space.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%