2019 IEEE 4th International Conference on Image, Vision and Computing (ICIVC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icivc47709.2019.8981092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Terrain Classification Methods for Mobile Robots Using Hybrid Coding Architecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This led to enhanced accuracy and gait speed in the robot's terrain recognition. Wu et al [ 193 ] combined the stacked denoising sparse automatic encoder and fisher vector techniques to achieve parameter self‐tuning through unsupervised machine learning. They conducted outdoor experiments on a quadruped robot with curved legs and obtained promising results in terrain recognition using datasets from various terrains.…”
Section: Autonomous Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This led to enhanced accuracy and gait speed in the robot's terrain recognition. Wu et al [ 193 ] combined the stacked denoising sparse automatic encoder and fisher vector techniques to achieve parameter self‐tuning through unsupervised machine learning. They conducted outdoor experiments on a quadruped robot with curved legs and obtained promising results in terrain recognition using datasets from various terrains.…”
Section: Autonomous Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The terrain image dataset Terrain8 [ 27 ] was used to evaluate the effectiveness of our method for visual terrain classification. Those images were all earth terrain images.…”
Section: Experiments Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the above experiment results, the RF classifier was selected as terrain classifier. The proposed method was compared with deep filter banks (DFBs) [ 27 ], hierarchical coding vectors (HCVs) [ 28 ], Fisher vector (FV) [ 29 ], LBP. Table 9 shows the classification results for five classification methods.…”
Section: Experiments Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using classifiers to train different terrain features, and then matched with the collected environment image information to achieve the terrain environment recognition. 26,27 In this study, random forest classifier is investigated for classification. 28 Random forest is a classifier that uses multiple trees to train and predict samples.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%