2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2016.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual soil evaluation: A summary of some applications and potential developments for agriculture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
93
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
93
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because, the VESS method assesses soil structural quality only up to 25 cm depth; hereby, the VESS cannot capture degradation in structural features below 25 cm depth (Ball et al., ) and may not suggest reliable management requirement (Emmet‐Booth et al., ). Therefore, methods such as SubVESS (Ball et al., , ) or DS (Emmet‐Booth et al., ) considering below 25 cm depth are needed to assess the structural quality of conventionally tilled soils. Moreover, the beneficial effect of tillage as indicated by low VESS scores will prevail only for the short term due to the adverse impact of breaking aggregates on the loss of organic carbon (Cherubin et al., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because, the VESS method assesses soil structural quality only up to 25 cm depth; hereby, the VESS cannot capture degradation in structural features below 25 cm depth (Ball et al., ) and may not suggest reliable management requirement (Emmet‐Booth et al., ). Therefore, methods such as SubVESS (Ball et al., , ) or DS (Emmet‐Booth et al., ) considering below 25 cm depth are needed to assess the structural quality of conventionally tilled soils. Moreover, the beneficial effect of tillage as indicated by low VESS scores will prevail only for the short term due to the adverse impact of breaking aggregates on the loss of organic carbon (Cherubin et al., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual methods have been increasingly preferred to directly examine the impacts of land use and management practices on soil structure due to the simplicity, reliability and low cost of the assessment procedure (Guimarães et al., ; Leopizzi, Gondret, & Boivin, ). Field level visual evaluation of soil structural quality provides reliable information on the current state of soil and guides farmers in evaluating the effects of management practices on the sustainability of their productions (Ball et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The interpretation of VESS scores was conducted according to Ball et al (2007), which is based on requirements to change management practices to preserve soil structural quality: Sq = 1 and Sq = 2, good soil structural quality, requiring no changes in management practices; Sq = 3, adequate soil structural quality; however there is need for improved soil management to avoid a further decline in soil quality (Ball et al, 2017). Therefore, we considered Sq = 3 as a provisional threshold from which soil starts to decline its structural quality; Sq = 4 and Sq = 5, indicate poor soil structural quality, requiring urgent remedial management practices.…”
Section: Visual Evaluation Of Soil Structure Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apesar dessa divisão ser bem estabelecida, os atributos estão interligados e, para que sejam eficientes na identificação da qualidade do solo, é necessário determinar valores e/ou padrões críticos (Gomes et al, 2006;Melloni et al, 2008). Ball et al (2016) demonstraram que métodos de avaliação visual do solo podem ser utilizados para detectar processos de compactação do solo, podendo ser aplicadas nas decisões de gestão para melhoria do solo, além de conhecimentos e ideias para a inovação na agricultura. Com as avaliações visuais da estrutura do solo, pode-se entender aspectos biológicos, como apresentado por Franco et al (2016), onde foi demonstrado que a deterioração da estrutura do solo correlaciona-se com a abundância e riqueza de macroinvertebrados no solo, com decréscimo nas áreas impactadas.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified