Visual Short-Term Memory for Coherent and Sequential Motion: A rTMS Investigation

Pavan, Andrea; Ghin, Filippo; Campana, Gianluca

doi:10.3390/brainsci11111471

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 84 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…According to Stanislaw and Todorov ( 1999 ), if one rate has an extreme value and the other does not, d′ is indeterminate, and in such a situation, one possibility is to quantify sensitivity with nonparametric measures, such as A prime. Hence, the corrected measure of sensitivity (A prime‐ that ranges from 0 to 1) was calculated using previously used formulae (Mueller & Zhang, 2006 ; Pavan et al., 2021 ). Response/decision bias (β) was calculated using the formula provided in Zhang and Mueller ( 2005 ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The impact of stimulus configuration on visual short‐term memory decline in normal aging and mild cognitive impairment

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionWhen we memorize simultaneous items, we not only store information about specific items and/or their locations but also how items are related to each other. Such relational information can be parsed into spatial (spatial configuration) and identity (object configuration) components. Both these configurations are found to support performance during a visual short‐term memory (VSTM) task in young adults. How the VSTM performance of older adults is influenced by object/spatial configuration is less understood, which this study investigated.MethodsTwenty‐nine young adults, 29 normally aging older adults, and 20 older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) completed two yes–no memory‐recognition experiments for four simultaneously presented items (2.5 s). Test display items were presented either at the same locations as the memory items (Experiment 1) or were globally shifted (Experiment 2). One of the test display items (target) was highlighted with a square box; participants indicated whether this item was shown in the preceding memory display. Both experiments comprised four conditions where nontarget items changed as follows: (i) nontarget items remained the same; (ii) nontarget items were replaced by new items; (iii) nontarget items switched locations; (iv) nontarget items were replaced by square boxes.ResultsPerformance (% correct) in both older groups was significantly reduced than young adults in both experiments and each condition. For the MCI adults, significantly reduced performance (vs. normal older adults) was found only for Experiment 1.ConclusionVSTM for simultaneous items declines significantly in normal aging; the decline is not influenced differently by spatial/object configuration change. The ability of VSTM to differentiate MCI from normal cognitive aging is apparent only where the spatial configuration of stimuli is retained at original locations. Findings are discussed in terms of the reduced ability to inhibit irrelevant items and location priming (by repetition) deficits.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The impact of stimulus configuration on visual short‐term memory decline in normal aging and mild cognitive impairment

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…RDMs provide a useful probe of motion perception, given the ability to parametrically control the relative saliency of the motion stimuli. They have been employed in psychophysical and neurophysiological experiments to understand underlying neural mechanisms of motion perception ( Britten et al, 1992 ; Purushothaman and Bradley, 2005 ), perceptual decision-making ( Mazurek et al, 2003 ; Gold and Shadlen, 2007 ; Beck et al, 2008 ), perceptual learning ( Ball and Sekuler, 1982 ; Zohary et al, 1994 ; Zanker, 1999 ; Seitz and Watanabe, 2003 ; Seitz et al, 2005 ; Law and Gold, 2008 ), motion direction discrimination ( Adelson and Bergen, 1985 ; Cleary and Braddick, 1990 ; Britten et al, 1996 ; Banton et al, 2001 ; Pavan et al, 2016 ), depth perception ( Kim and Mollon, 2002 ; Nadler et al, 2008 ; Kim et al, 2016 ), and short-term visual memory ( Pavan et al, 2013 , 2021 ) among other processes. While RDMs have emerged as one of the most conventional psychophysical paradigms for studying properties of visual motion perception processes, to date, RDM-based tasks are largely regulated to specialize in laboratory-based software systems (e.g., Psychophysics Toolbox for MATLAB, PsychoPy, Eprime, etc.)…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing random dot motion in MATLAB vs. Inquisit Millisecond

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Random Dot Motion (RDM) displays refer to clouds of independently moving dots that can be parametrically manipulated to provide a perception of the overall cloud moving coherently in a specified direction of motion. As a well-studied probe of motion perception, RDMs have been widely employed to understand underlying neural mechanisms of motion perception, perceptual decision-making, and perceptual learning, among other processes. Despite their wide use, RDM stimuli implementation is highly dependent on the parameters and the generation algorithm of the stimuli; both can greatly influence behavioral performance on RDM tasks. With the advent of the COVID pandemic and an increased need for more accessible platforms, we aimed to validate a novel RDM paradigm on Inquisit Millisecond, a platform for the online administration of cognitive and neuropsychological tests and assessments. We directly compared, in the same participants using the same display, a novel RDM paradigm on both Inquisit Millisecond and MATLAB with Psychtoolbox. We found that psychometric functions of Coherence largely match between Inquisit Millisecond and MATLAB, as do the effects of Duration. These data demonstrate that the Millisecond RDM provides data largely consistent with those previously found in laboratory-based systems, and the present findings can serve as a reference point for expected thresholds for when these procedures are used remotely on different platforms.

show abstract

“…Pavan at al. [ 4 ] used the rTMS protocol for interfering with the activity of the human medio-temporal complex (hMT+) in order to investigate its crucial role in in the memory encoding of visual motion direction. Healthy participants were asked to indicate whether a test random dot kinematogram (RDK) had the same motion direction as any of the four RDKs shown in the memory sample.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%