2009
DOI: 10.1080/02699930801976523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual search for schematic affective faces: Stability and variability of search slopes with different instances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
39
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with previous studies [2,3,[7][8][9]11]. Moreover, as we had hypothesized, TD children showed this effect even when faces were inverted.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is consistent with previous studies [2,3,[7][8][9]11]. Moreover, as we had hypothesized, TD children showed this effect even when faces were inverted.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…ASE has been studied using a visual search paradigm in which participants searched for discrepant angry or happy faces in a crowd of distractor faces [4][5][6]. Several studies have confirmed that ASE can be observed with schematic-faces as well [1,[7][8][9][10]. By using schematic faces it is possible to eliminate many lowlevel perceptual variations found in photographs of emotional expressions, and to better control experiment variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gerritsen, Frischen, Blake, Smilek, & Eastwood, 2008;Notebaert, Crombez, Van Damme, De Houwer, & Theeuwes, in press), indicating that threatening stimuli are prioritized over neutral stimuli, but do not automatically capture attention . This prioritization of threat has also been found in other studies that have controlled for methodological confounds (Gerritsen et al, 2008;Horstmann, 2009). …”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…On account of the atypical population being assessed, we chose to use a methodology in which participants were required to look for a specific emotion (cf. Horstmann, 2009), rather than to detect an odd-one-out. The distracter emotion was therefore included to ensure procedural consistency across Visual Search for Emotional Expressions in Autism 8 participants.…”
Section: Design and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%