The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.10.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual racism in internet searches and dermatology textbooks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
18
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(5 reference statements)
3
18
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Their characterization of the underrepresentation of skin of color in top search results online reinforces the relative lesser ability of dermatologists to diagnose conditions in darker-skinned patients. 2 The authors' description of potential bias in Google's search algorithm is consistent with biases described in prior studies and criticisms of Google's search algorithms. 2,3 Notably, out of 5 websites appearing in the top 10 image results, the 4 most frequent were medical media outlets or resources, including DermNetNZ, MedicalNewsToday, Healthline, and MerckManuals, indicating that a bias toward lighter-skinned patients in Google's image search results may in fact be a consequence or perpetuation of similar biases on these sites.…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their characterization of the underrepresentation of skin of color in top search results online reinforces the relative lesser ability of dermatologists to diagnose conditions in darker-skinned patients. 2 The authors' description of potential bias in Google's search algorithm is consistent with biases described in prior studies and criticisms of Google's search algorithms. 2,3 Notably, out of 5 websites appearing in the top 10 image results, the 4 most frequent were medical media outlets or resources, including DermNetNZ, MedicalNewsToday, Healthline, and MerckManuals, indicating that a bias toward lighter-skinned patients in Google's image search results may in fact be a consequence or perpetuation of similar biases on these sites.…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…2 The authors' description of potential bias in Google's search algorithm is consistent with biases described in prior studies and criticisms of Google's search algorithms. 2,3 Notably, out of 5 websites appearing in the top 10 image results, the 4 most frequent were medical media outlets or resources, including DermNetNZ, MedicalNewsToday, Healthline, and MerckManuals, indicating that a bias toward lighter-skinned patients in Google's image search results may in fact be a consequence or perpetuation of similar biases on these sites. Thus, the authors' findings may, in fact, reflect the larger issue, in general, of the underrepresentation of skin of color in dermatology, educational materials, and reference materials, 4 even including skin findings reported in association with COVID-19.…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…Of the remaining 2871 images, 61.5% were classified as light/white, 30% as medium/brown and 8.5% as dark/ black (Table 1). Compared to general dermatology textbooks [3][4][5] we found that SOC images (brown + black = 38.52%) were better represented in pediatric dermatology textbooks. Still, there exists a real knowledge gap as regards to confidently diagnosing skin diseases in SOC.…”
Section: Re Sults and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…2 Evaluations of clinical photographs in standard dermatology textbooks have shown an insufficient exposure to SOC images. [3][4][5] These studies found that there were few photographs of dark skin for common skin diseases, making it difficult for students to identify skin conditions in brown and black skin, consequently hampering patient management. 3,5…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation