Visual Quality after Acrysof IQ ReSTOR Intraocular Lens Implantation in Eyes with High Myopia

Wang, Qing; Zhao, Guopeng; Wang, Qian; Jia, Wenyan

doi:10.5301/ejo.2011.8357

Cited by 18 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, as we have introduced, the use of multifocal IOLs for presbyopia correction in eyes with long axial lengths has been increasing due to the good outcomes reported previously by several authors using different IOL models. 12,13,15,16 Our results revealed good visual acuity outcomes for both groups of patients, long eye and nasal-inferior staphyloma. Safety and efficacy indexes were larger than 1.0 in all cases.…”

Section: Spherical Equivalent (D)supporting

confidence: 53%

“…The mean logMAR CDVA was 0.05 and the IOL power implanted ranged from 10 to 14.50D (mean 12.09D). Wang et al 13 reported the same postoperative mean logMAR CDVA (0.05) in two groups of eyes implanted with the SN6AD3 and SN6AD1 lenses (24 eyes each group, with 6.5-14 D IOL power range and a mean value of 11.19±2.15D and 11.9±1.52D, respectively). They found that all eyes had a CDVA of 20/25 or better.…”

Section: Spherical Equivalent (D)mentioning

confidence: 81%

“…However, its interesting to analyze these studies and compare with those found in our series of patients. For example, Alfonso et al 12 and Wang et al 13 assessed patients implanted with the AcrySof ReSTOR IOL at 6 months post-surgery. Alfonso et al 12 using the SN60D3 lens in 76 high myopic eyes showed a CDVA of 20/40 or better in 96% of eyes and 20/25 or better in 88.1% of eyes.…”

Section: Spherical Equivalent (D)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Alfonso et al 12 assessed the outcomes found in 76 high myopic eyes (10-14.50 D IOL power, and 43-73 years) with the AcrySof ReSTOR IOL concluding that this lens provided good visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. Wang et al 13 found a high level of spectacle independence and satisfaction among patients with high myopia with the AcrySof ReSTOR IOLs (48 eyes with 6.5-14 D IOL power, and 45-68 years). Martiano and Cochener 14 evaluated 52 high myopic eyes with the AT LISA bifocal IOL showing favourable results at 6 years (26.54-30.7 mm axial length, 0-14 D IOL power, and 49-69 years).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

<p>Implantation of a Trifocal Intraocular Lens in High Myopic Eyes with Nasal-Inferior Staphyloma</p>

Alfonso-Bartolozzi¹,

Villota²,

González³

et al. 2020

OPTH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To assess visual outcomes in high myopic eyes with nasal-inferior staphyloma implanted with a pseudophakic trifocal intraocular lens (IOL). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the visual outcomes of 50 eyes of 45 patients who had cataract surgery after AT LISA trifocal IOL implantation. Twenty-five eyes diagnosed with posterior staphyloma (nasal-inferior, type IV and V), and 25 eyes as long eyes. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) values were used to assess the efficacy and safety of the surgery. Refraction and defocus curves were also evaluated at 6 months. Results: No intra-or post-operative problems occurred during the 6 months of follow-up. After the surgery, the mean Snellen decimal UDVA ranged from 0.50 to 1.00, and CDVA from 0.60 to 1.00 for both groups. CDVA was 0.91 and 0.74 for the long eye and nasalinferior staphyloma groups, respectively. Efficacy and safety indexes were 1.22 and 1.32 for the long eye, and 1.26 and 1.43 for the nasal-inferior staphyloma group, respectively. All eyes of both groups showed a postoperative spherical equivalent within ±1.00D. The long eye group showed the highest percentage of spherical equivalent between −0.13D and +0.13D (56%) and the nasal-inferior staphyloma group was between −0.51D and −0.14D (40%). Conclusion: The outcomes of the present study show that a trifocal IOL provides good visual acuity in high myopic eyes, being worse for nasal-inferior staphyloma eyes. The degree of tilt of the macular plane is related with the expected visual acuity.

show abstract

Section: Spherical Equivalent (D)supporting

confidence: 53%

Section: Spherical Equivalent (D)mentioning

confidence: 81%

Section: Spherical Equivalent (D)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

<p>Implantation of a Trifocal Intraocular Lens in High Myopic Eyes with Nasal-Inferior Staphyloma</p>

Alfonso-Bartolozzi¹,

Villota²,

González³

et al. 2020

OPTH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…2(b), (c) really mean the multifocal function of ReSTOR or not. They are quite different from defocus curves in ReSTOR implantation patients [13][14][15]. We expected the second peak of pseudo-accommodation curvesat +2.5Dbecause the SND1 model has the addition of+3 D (+2.5D at the spectacle plane).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 76%

Double-Pass System (Optical Quality Analysis System) for Analysis of the Multifocal Function of a Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens (Acrysof ReSTOR®) Compared to a Monofocal Intraocular Lens (Acrysof IQ®)

Hwang

Shin

Joo

2014

Journal of the Optical Society of Korea

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, we objectively determined whether the ReSTOR as a multifocal IOL (intraocular lens) has a multifocal function compared to the IQ as a monofocal IOL in vivo by OQAS (Optical Quality Analysis System). Eighteen patients who had cataract surgery with implantation of ReSTOR (27 eyes) and 15 patients with IQ (21 eyes), were included inthis study. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA)and distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) were measured. After setting the artificial pupil size to 3 mm, we performed 'Optical quality'. We inputted defocusdiopters of (objective spherical refraction)(far), (objective spherical refraction-1.25 D)(intermediate),(objective spherical refraction-2.5 D)(near), and (objective spherical refraction-3.5 D)(very near) into 'selected spherical refraction' simulating theoptical quality at far, intermediate, and near distance. We changed the pupil size to 5 mm and repeated thesame measurements. The UCDVA and CDVA did not show significant differences between the 2 groups. But, theUCNVA and DCNVA of the ReSTOR group were better than those of the IQ group (p=0.000, p=0.000). For 3 mm pupil, at far distance, modulation transfer function (MTF) cut off and point spread function (PSF) width at 50% of ReSTOR were worse than those of IQ (p=0.039, p=0.020). At intermediate distance, MTF cut off, Strehl ratio and PSF width at 50% of ReSTOR were worse than those of IQ (p=0.001, p=0.001, p=0.000). At near distance, MTF cut off of ReSTOR was worse than that of IQ (p=0.033). At very near distance, MTF cut off and Strehl ratio of ReSTOR were worse than those of IQ (p=0.002, p=0.002), but PSF width at 50% of ReSTOR was better than that of IQ. For 5 mm pupil, most parameters at each distance, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. Only PSF width at 50% of ReSTOR were worse than those of IQ at intermediate distance (p=0.013). It was impossible to show the multifocal function of ReSTOR compared to the IQ byOQAS.

show abstract

Diffractive trifocal pseudophakic intraocular lenses in high myopic eyes: 2-year assessment after implantation

Javaloy

Rivera

Montalbán

et al. 2019

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Visual Quality after Acrysof IQ ReSTOR Intraocular Lens Implantation in Eyes with High Myopia

Abstract: Compared with aspheric monofocal IOL, AcrySof ReSTOR IQ multifocal IOLs could provide a functional vision range from near to distance, resulting in high level of spectacle independence and satisfaction among patients with high myopia.

Cited by 18 publications

References 20 publications

<p>Implantation of a Trifocal Intraocular Lens in High Myopic Eyes with Nasal-Inferior Staphyloma</p>

<p>Implantation of a Trifocal Intraocular Lens in High Myopic Eyes with Nasal-Inferior Staphyloma</p>

Double-Pass System (Optical Quality Analysis System) for Analysis of the Multifocal Function of a Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens (Acrysof ReSTOR®) Compared to a Monofocal Intraocular Lens (Acrysof IQ®)

Diffractive trifocal pseudophakic intraocular lenses in high myopic eyes: 2-year assessment after implantation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About