2000
DOI: 10.1006/jevp.1999.0163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Properties and Affective Appraisals in Residential Areas in Daylight

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
55
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, subjects evaluated scenes on a 28 item questionnaire adopted, slightly modified and translated into German from a previous study [29]. After testing subjects were asked, if they had any prior experience with the areas they had just seen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, subjects evaluated scenes on a 28 item questionnaire adopted, slightly modified and translated into German from a previous study [29]. After testing subjects were asked, if they had any prior experience with the areas they had just seen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first questionnaire was used by experts to rate twelve environmental characteristics and the second questionnaire was used by the research team to rate the photographs on an additional seven environmental characteristics that were easier to objectify. These questionnaires were based upon the following existing environmental assessment tools: The Irvine-Minnesota Inventory (Day, Boarnet, Alfonzo, & Forsyth, 2006), SWEAT (Cunningham, Michael, Farquhar, & Lapidus, 2005), SWEAT-R (Michael, et al, 2009), SPACES (Pikora, et al, 2002), and a questionnaire used by Hanyu (2000). A first questionnaire was used by five experts in the field of PA-environment research to rate the environments on the following twelve environmental characteristics: sidewalk width, sidewalk upkeep, sidewalk evenness, presence of driveways (crossing the sidewalk), safety to cross, surveillance (i.e.…”
Section: Photographsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For formal variables, researchers consider two main semantic scales: complexity and coherence (Nasar 1998). A number of studies have investigated the influence of complexity and coherence on environmental aesthetic evaluations (Akad and Cubukcu 2006;Canter 1969;Hanyu 1997Hanyu , 2000Kaplan 1992;Nasar 1992a, c). For the symbolic variables, many studies consider safety (Akad and Cubukcu 2006;Hanyu 1997Hanyu , 2000Nasar et al 1992;Nasar 1992c;Stamps 2005;Appleton 1975;Ulrich 1983;Kaplan and Kaplan 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Russell (1992) grouped the affective variables under two main headings (arousal and pleasantness) and two subheadings (excitement and relaxing). Those variables (arousal, pleasantness, excitement and relaxing) were used in various studies on environmental aesthetics (Akad and Cubukcu 2006;Hanyu 1997Hanyu , 2000Nasar 1983Nasar , 1992aNasar et al 1992;Russell 1992;Ulrich 1983;Ward and Russell 1981;Wells and Evans 2003). For formal variables, researchers consider two main semantic scales: complexity and coherence (Nasar 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%