1995
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199512001-00012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Processing and Mobility Performance in Visually Impaired Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through dependent t-tests Kuyk and Elliot (1999) found 41 veterans with AMD in decreased illumination who increased mean travel time, but also increased participant collisions with route obstacles and discovered field of vision and contrast ability predict mobility performance. These results echo similar findings produced by Kuyk et al (1996) who found in their sample of 88 veterans with vision loss, persons with decreased acuity navigate more effectively than those with peripheral loss and limited contrast detection. Additionally, the influence of glare was found to affect route traversal time and efficiency.…”
Section: Functional Vision and Mobility Performancesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Through dependent t-tests Kuyk and Elliot (1999) found 41 veterans with AMD in decreased illumination who increased mean travel time, but also increased participant collisions with route obstacles and discovered field of vision and contrast ability predict mobility performance. These results echo similar findings produced by Kuyk et al (1996) who found in their sample of 88 veterans with vision loss, persons with decreased acuity navigate more effectively than those with peripheral loss and limited contrast detection. Additionally, the influence of glare was found to affect route traversal time and efficiency.…”
Section: Functional Vision and Mobility Performancesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Black et al [12] and Leat and Lovie-Kitchin [7] verified that PFL can significantly slow walking speed, whereas AL impaired self-locomotion perception. Matsuda et al [13] and Kuyk, T. [30] derived the similar conclusion with both AL and PFL patients. For an on-site experiment that included simulated AL and simulated PFL participants, Tarampi [31] indicated spatial updating remains accurate during locomotion under conditions of significantly degraded AL and contrast, albeit with heightened variability compared to non-degraded viewing.…”
Section: Large Scale Spatial Task: Mobility Wayfinding and Navigationsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Comparisons to the literature are difficult since the mobility courses used to date have the disadvantages of requiring a great deal of time and require a large amount of space [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. They are therefore not amenable for repeated testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in order to use the mobility performance as a measure of visual function, a mobility test, which is applicable for repeated testing, is needed so that patient's progress can be monitored. The mobility tests developed to date by other researchers are either not amenable to repeated testing because they are too long and require large amounts of space [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] or are designed to test subjects whose vision is substantially better than what is anticipated of subjects at the early phase of retinal implants where the assumed visual acuity will still be within the profound visual impairment range with a visual field (VF) of approximately 20 • .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%