2013
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0516-z
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual priming through a boost of the target signal: Evidence from saccadic landing positions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
19
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(26 reference statements)
2
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to contrast the results of Experiment 2 against the findings of a recent study on visual priming (Meeter & Van der Stigchel, 2013). The Meeter and Van der Stigchel study showed that repeating the color of the target in consecutive trials resulted in a stronger deviation of the saccade endpoint towards the target (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…It is interesting to contrast the results of Experiment 2 against the findings of a recent study on visual priming (Meeter & Van der Stigchel, 2013). The Meeter and Van der Stigchel study showed that repeating the color of the target in consecutive trials resulted in a stronger deviation of the saccade endpoint towards the target (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The results are thus in line with the idea that priming improves visual search task performance by enhancing perceptual processing of the cued items. Such an enhancement may comprise of boosting the target signal prior to selection (Lee et al, 2009; Meeter and van der Stigchel, 2013), and speeding perceptual decision about the target identity once it is already selected (Huang et al, 2004). While the current results may not differentiate between these two possibilities, they nevertheless show how exact cues prime the perceptual processing of the search target and thereby influence measures of visual search task performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our experiment, the target-defining feature was indeed independent of the response-related feature (Goolsby & Suzuki, 2001;Maljkovic & Nakayama, 1994. According to the attentional view of priming of pop-out, early perceptual and attentional stages are facilitated (Maljkovic & Nakayama, 1994;Eimer, Kiss, & Cheung, 2010;Meeter & Van der Stigchel, 2013). But the nature of the processes that speed attentional shifts to the locations of previously attended targets remains uncertain.…”
Section: Priming Of Pop-outmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The efficiency of selecting and reporting the single salient target is modulated by the properties of the preceding search arrays, but the nature of this modulation is still a matter of debate (Becker, 2008b;Kristjánsson & Campana, 2010;Lamy et al, 2010). The main theoretical account stipulates that early perceptual processing of the feature is facilitated, resulting in faster attentional selection of the repeated target (Eimer et al, 2010;Maljkovic & Nakayama, 1994;Meeter & Van der Stigchel, 2013). It remains unclear what aspects of attention to the search target on the previous trial actually speed the attentional selection on the current trial (Ásgeirsson & Kristjánsson, 2011;Becker, 2008a;Lee et al, 2009;Maljkovic & Nakayama, 2000).…”
Section: Priming Of Pop-outmentioning
confidence: 99%