2016
DOI: 10.1080/23268743.2016.1241160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual pleasure and gonzo pornography: Mason’s challenge to convention in ‘the hardest of hardcore’

Abstract: This article focuses on the work of enigmatic female gonzo director Mason, and examines her filmic negotiations of genre convention within the mainstream American gonzo industry. Close analyses of her films reveal a rich, textured set of filmic strategies which complicate conceptions of what mainstream gonzo pornography looks like and how it functions. This article presents an overview of her career to date, examine the articulation of her relationship with her female performers, and discusses her authorial tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Monica speaks implicitly to the visibility of men's arousal as a marker of the authenticity of the sexuality represented in gay pornography. Indeed, the symbolic embodiments of masculine physicality (erection, the cumshot) have long been relied upon as tangible proof of the authenticity of men's sexual pleasure in pornography (Lodder, 2016;Shamoon, 2004;Williams, 1999). However, the validity of these markers, too, can be called into question, for example, by the existence of "fluffers," the ability to edit video to produce the illusion of unbroken penile tumescence, marathon-esque longevity, and powerful ejaculations, and the rampant use of sexual enhancement medications in pornography (Farvid & Braun, 2006;Gurevich et al, 2017;Gurevich, Cormier, Leedham, & Brown-Bowers 2018;Potts, 2002, Williams, 1999.…”
Section: Authenticity Of Pleasurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monica speaks implicitly to the visibility of men's arousal as a marker of the authenticity of the sexuality represented in gay pornography. Indeed, the symbolic embodiments of masculine physicality (erection, the cumshot) have long been relied upon as tangible proof of the authenticity of men's sexual pleasure in pornography (Lodder, 2016;Shamoon, 2004;Williams, 1999). However, the validity of these markers, too, can be called into question, for example, by the existence of "fluffers," the ability to edit video to produce the illusion of unbroken penile tumescence, marathon-esque longevity, and powerful ejaculations, and the rampant use of sexual enhancement medications in pornography (Farvid & Braun, 2006;Gurevich et al, 2017;Gurevich, Cormier, Leedham, & Brown-Bowers 2018;Potts, 2002, Williams, 1999.…”
Section: Authenticity Of Pleasurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For children and young adolescents, much of their viewing of pornography is accidental or unintentional (Baker, 2016;Flood, 2007;Nash et al, 2015;Ybarra & Mitchell, 2005), and research with young people suggests that some young people are distressed by pornographic content they have seen online (Green, Brady, Holloway, Staksrud, & Olafsson, 2013;Livingstone, Haddon, Gorzig, & Olafsson, 2011;Smith, 2012), or concerned about the impacts of pornography for their friends (Walker, Temple-Smith, Higgs, & Sanci, 2015). That said, young people experience and negotiate pornography in a multitude of ways, and their interactions with pornography online are not always unintentional, nor are they always viewed as distressing and/or harmful by young people themselves (Attwood et al, 2018b;Mulholland, 2013;Rothman, Kaczmarsky, Burke, Jansen, & Baughman, 2015;Smith, 2012).…”
Section: Overexposed? Young People and Internet Pornographymentioning
confidence: 99%