SummaryThe aim of this study was to compare efficacy and particularly patient preference of sub-Tenon's anaesthesia with peribulbar anaesthesia in patients undergoing sequential, bilateral, cataract surgery. Fifty patients were randomised to either sub-Tenon's or peribulbar anaesthesia for their first operation and the alternative technique for their subsequent operation. Intra-ocular pressure was measured, globe and lid akinesia were scored, patients completed a visual rating score of injection and operative pain and their preference for anaesthesia was assessed. Intra-ocular pressure rose significantly following peribulbar injection (p = 0.02) but was comparable at 5 min. There was no significant difference in lid or globe movement. Injection and operative pain scores were low and comparable. Both methods provided similar anaesthesia and akinesia. The majority (86%) chose the method they received first irrespective of whether it was sub-Tenon's or peribulbar, but 10% of patients preferred sub-Tenon's, disliking the facial numbness from peribulbar anaesthesia. With the evolution of small incision phaco-emulsification for cataract surgery, there has been a changing trend in the anaesthesia performed. The anaesthetic technique must produce optimal surgical conditions, providing good anaesthesia for the patient in a safe manner. As a result, sub-Tenon's anaesthesia, using a blunt cannula, has gained increasing popularity. In a survey of current practice in the UK in 2003, it comprised 42.6% of the anaesthetics performed for cataract surgery [1]; peribulbar accounted for 30.6%. Sharp needle techniques are associated with risks such as inadvertent globe perforation, retrobulbar haemorrhage or direct injection into the optic nerve. Sub-Tenon's anaesthesia does not expose patients to these sight threatening consequences. A further possible consequence of sharp needle techniques is injection into the dural sheath leading to unconsciousness and cardiovascular compromise from local anaesthetic effect on the brainstem. These are rare but serious complications. Studies comparing sub-Tenon's with peribulbar anaesthesia in different patient groups have shown it to be at least as effective in terms of anaesthesia and provision of surgical conditions and have demonstrated that it has a more favourable safety profile [2][3][4][5]. There is, however, little available evidence on patients' preferences and perspectives for type of anaesthesia. The aim of this study was to compare the two methods of anaesthesia in patients having bilateral cataract surgery and to ascertain whether patients preferred one method of anaesthesia over the other as the primary outcome.
MethodsLocal Research Ethics Committee approval and individual patient consent were obtained. Fifty patients undergoing sequential bilateral cataract surgery were randomly allocated to have either sub-Tenon's anaesthesia for their first operation and peribulbar anaesthesia for their second operation, or the reverse of this. All patients were monitored with pulse oximetry a...