2011 Aerospace Conference 2011
DOI: 10.1109/aero.2011.5747268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual odometry aided by a sun sensor and inclinometer

Abstract: ii

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is in this context, in which the sun and other celestial features like polarized skylight can provide most valuable orientation cues (Lambert et al 2011). If the behavior of the animal involves prolonged straight segments or a central point to which it has to return, having a global frame of reference is of great importance for ensuring accuracy.…”
Section: Putting Polarized Light Into Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is in this context, in which the sun and other celestial features like polarized skylight can provide most valuable orientation cues (Lambert et al 2011). If the behavior of the animal involves prolonged straight segments or a central point to which it has to return, having a global frame of reference is of great importance for ensuring accuracy.…”
Section: Putting Polarized Light Into Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in [20], this range measurement bias has a strong influence on motion estimation. Their experimental result claims that the improper selection of feature points may cause the bias error in motion estimation.…”
Section: B Range Uncertainty and Statistical Biasmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand, the threshold for near points is given by several tangled factors: the location uncertainty, the directional error in (20), and the triangulation bias derived from (2). Under the assumption of z >> b, the location uncertainty is formulated as…”
Section: E Thresholdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated pitch of the vehicle had a negative bias (e.g., the vehicle tended to estimate that it was pitching upward) whose magnitude seemed strongly correlated to the visual appearance of the terrain that the vehicle was in, making calibration before the field trials unsuitable. Lambert () does a deeper analysis of this visual‐odometry bias.…”
Section: Field Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%