1990
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1990.2.4.320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Object Representation: Interpreting Neurophysiological Data within a Computational Framework

Abstract: Abstractrn Significant progress has been made in understanding vision by combining computational and neuroscientific constraints. However, for the most part these integrative approaches have been limited to low-level visual processing. Recent advances in our understanding of high-level vision in the two separate disciplines warrant an attempt to relate and integrate these results to extend our understanding of vision through object representation and recognition. This paper is an attempt to contribute to this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
53
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(131 reference statements)
4
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it may still be premature to localize repetition priming, the suggestion that visual repetition priming is mediated in IT is appealing for a number of reasons. IT plays a critical role in object recognition (see Plaut & Farah, 1990, for a review), and large receptive fields in IT make it insensitive to variations in location or scale. Despite equating across locations in space, IT remains acutely sensitive to shape properties of stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although it may still be premature to localize repetition priming, the suggestion that visual repetition priming is mediated in IT is appealing for a number of reasons. IT plays a critical role in object recognition (see Plaut & Farah, 1990, for a review), and large receptive fields in IT make it insensitive to variations in location or scale. Despite equating across locations in space, IT remains acutely sensitive to shape properties of stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neurons in inferotemporal cortex (IT) seem to act in just this way (see Plaut & Farah, 1990, for a review). IT is the end stage of processing in the what visual system (Ungerleider & Mishkin, 1982) that is essential for object recognition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea is based to a large extent on findings from single cell recordings and brain lesions in nonhuman primates indicating that inferior temporal regions are involved in the computation of size and reflection invariant object representations (for review, see Plaut & Farah, 1990). It is possible, of course, that the precise neuroanatomical locus of this system differs in monkey and man, but the human data on this point are not conclusive.…”
Section: Structural Description Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This overall pattern of ¢ndings has led us to propose that priming depends on a structural description system (Riddoch & Humphreys 1987) that represents information about the global structure of an object independently of its retinal size and left/right orientation (for an alternative interpretation, see Ratcli¡ & McKoon 1995;see also, Schacter & Cooper 1995). Schacter et al (1991) noted that numerous lesion studies and experiments using electrophysiological recordings implicate regions of inferior temporal cortex in the identi¢cation of complex visual stimuli (for reviews, see Plaut & Farah 1990;Tanaka 1993). Studies of animals with lesions to inferior temporal regions suggest that this region participates in the sizeand re£ection-invariant representation of global object structure.…”
Section: I M Pl Ic I T a N D E X Pl Ic I T M E Mory For Nov E L O Bmentioning
confidence: 99%