2010
DOI: 10.1177/1362361309353615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual influences on speech perception in children with autism

Abstract: The bimodal perception of speech sounds was examined in children with autism as compared to mental age-matched typically developing (TD) children. A computer task was employed wherein only the mouth region of the face was displayed and children reported what they heard or saw when presented with consonant-vowel sounds in unimodal auditory condition, unimodal visual condition, and a bimodal condition. Children with autism showed less visual influence and more auditory influence on their bimodal speech perceptio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

10
54
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
10
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings indicate that individuals with ASD do not integrate visual and auditory information in the same manner as TD children. Others however have suggested that these differences are due to poorer lip reading abilities in ASD (Iarocci et al 2010;Williams et al 2004), as well as the confounding effects of using social (e.g. faces) and/or linguistic stimuli, which are inherently more difficult for individuals with ASD to process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These findings indicate that individuals with ASD do not integrate visual and auditory information in the same manner as TD children. Others however have suggested that these differences are due to poorer lip reading abilities in ASD (Iarocci et al 2010;Williams et al 2004), as well as the confounding effects of using social (e.g. faces) and/or linguistic stimuli, which are inherently more difficult for individuals with ASD to process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…When presented with speech sounds that do not match lip movements, participants with ASC report that they perceive the sound, rather than the fused multisensory percept. This could indicate general difficulties with multisensory processing (Smith and Bennetto 2007), but could also be driven by problems with lip reading (Iarocci et al 2010;Taylor et al 2010;Williams et al 2004). Importantly, the social and semantic stimuli used in this paradigm increases the difficulty of the task for individuals with autism, independently of the multisensory demands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…One of the best illustrations of this complexity is in work that has explored the susceptibility of individuals with autism to the McGurk effect – the perceptual illusion that indexes the synthesis of visual and auditory speech signals [249]. Whereas some groups have found weaknesses in this perceptual fusion [250-256], others have found normal McGurk percepts [257, 258] or changes in McGurk reports that are accountable by changes in responsiveness to the visual or auditory speech tokens [259]. The likely explanations for the substantial disparities across studies include differences in the composition of the ASD cohort (with age and severity of symptoms being significant factors) and differences in how the specific tasks are structured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%