2019
DOI: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Inference for the Funnel Plot in Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Abstract. The funnel plot is widely used in meta-analyses to assess potential publication bias. However, experimental evidence suggests that informal, mere visual, inspection of funnel plots is frequently prone to incorrect conclusions, and formal statistical tests (Egger regression and others) entirely focus on funnel plot asymmetry. We suggest using the visual inference framework with funnel plots routinely, including for didactic purposes. In this framework, the type I error is controlled by design, while t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The media effect theory states that the effect of media has boundary conditions. That is, people only pay attention to a limited number of messages in the categories that they are interested in, and only the messages they choose are likely to affect them (Klapper 1960). This phenomenon has been confirmed by various studies.…”
Section: Selective Media Exposurementioning
confidence: 79%
“…The media effect theory states that the effect of media has boundary conditions. That is, people only pay attention to a limited number of messages in the categories that they are interested in, and only the messages they choose are likely to affect them (Klapper 1960). This phenomenon has been confirmed by various studies.…”
Section: Selective Media Exposurementioning
confidence: 79%
“…There were also indications that a single jurisdiction was responsible for attenuation to non-significance in some injuries, such as the lone positive effect among musculoskeletal conditions in the Northern Territory (1.00, 0.04 to 1.96). We conducted “leave one out” sensitivity analyses, 25 which tested the effect of dropping each jurisdiction from meta-analyses. Combined effects for mental health conditions became significant with the exclusion of both Comcare (-1.74, -3.41 to -0.08) and South Australia (-1.71, -3.42 to 0.00), and for musculoskeletal conditions with the exclusion of the Northern Territory (-0.69, -1.35 to -0.03).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses were conducted in R with RStudio using the following packages: ggpubr , 22 lubridate , 23 metafor , 24 metaviz , 25 rdd , 26 rddtools , 27 scales , 28 see , 29 tidyverse , 30 and zoo . 31 Aggregated data and R code are available on a FigShare repository.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results were considered significant when p < 0.05. As recommended by Shild and Voracek [ 49 ], we used a rainforest plot, an enhanced variant of the classic forest plot, consisting in a graphical display of estimated results of a number of studies on the same issue (here, the overall average means of LC 50 or IC 50 calculated per DTU-parasite form-time point), using the “viz rainforest” function of the metaviz package for R [ 50 ]. The results of the statistical comparisons between groups defined by parasite form–drug incubation time—DTU were reported on the rainforest plot.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%