2001
DOI: 10.1097/00041327-200112000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Function and Quality of Life Among Patients with Giant Cell (Temporal) Arteritis

Abstract: Except for the day driving score, the ADVS did not differ between patients with and without visual loss. The SF-36 did not distinguish between patients with and without visual loss and did not reveal significant trends. The ADVS and SF-36 did not reveal significant disability in GCA patients and there were no strong correlations with any visual performance or systemic measures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
23
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, patients with visual complications and those who reported visual problems in our specific questionnaire did not have lower scores in the specific SF36 QOL domains. These data are similar to Kupersmith et al's study, as their results did not show any significant QOL impairment in patients with visual loss at one year of GCA diagnosis [9]. However, patients who reported visual disturbances in our GCA specific questionnaire had a daily impairment score of 3 which corresponds to a Bmoderate^impairment and was the highest impairment score regarding all items.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, patients with visual complications and those who reported visual problems in our specific questionnaire did not have lower scores in the specific SF36 QOL domains. These data are similar to Kupersmith et al's study, as their results did not show any significant QOL impairment in patients with visual loss at one year of GCA diagnosis [9]. However, patients who reported visual disturbances in our GCA specific questionnaire had a daily impairment score of 3 which corresponds to a Bmoderate^impairment and was the highest impairment score regarding all items.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…So far, few studies have assessed QOL in patients with GCA. For Kupersmith et al, there was no correlation between BActivities of Daily Vision Scale^(ADVS) score, SF36 score, and visual impairment 1 year after GCA diagnosis [9]. Hellmann et al focused on the importance of several altered domains of QOL in GCA patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional evidence included media degeneration or intima thickening 1. Visual acuity was expressed as a decimal (20/20 = 1.00; finger counting = 0.012; hand motion = 0.006; light perception = 0.001; no light perception = 0) 2. In order to compare steroids among patients, the doses in patients receiving a steroid other than hydrocortisone were converted according to the following dosing scheme: 1 mg dexamethasone = 30 mg hydrocortisone; 1 mg methylprednisolone = 5 mg hydrocortisone, 1 mg prednisone = 4 mg hydrocortisone.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, patient preferences/perspectives should be incorporated into GCA assessment. In one study, the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 scores did not correlate with the presence of vision loss at baseline, systemic complications or side effects of steroid therapy13 while disease-specific instruments for GCA are currently unavailable. Moreover, we will probably need age-specific questionnaires to improve validity of outcomes measure in the elderly patients with GCA.…”
Section: Patient-reported Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%