1978
DOI: 10.3758/bf03326751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual form perception is a function of the visual cortex

Abstract: Rats prepared with serial visual-cortical ablations can relearn the horizontal-vertical stripes discrimination problem if given interoperative training. However, they fail to discriminate between obliquely oriented stripes. The findings are discussed in relation to the concept that pattern perception is completely dependent upon the integrity of cortically related systems. Furthermore, the criteria for constructing pattern discriminanda are outlined, and reasons are presented for abandoning some of the classic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding was interesting because the OB problem is completely and permanently insoluble by rats with injuries to the posterior cortex (Horel, Bettinger, Royce, & Meyer, 1966;Jonason et aI., 1970;Lavond, Hata, Gray, Geckler, Meyer, & Meyer, 1978). Hence, if there is, in fact, a consequence of OB training for postoperative performance of the BW problem, the conse- quence is uninterpretable in terms of transfer of training that is mediated via reactions to discriminative cues that are present in both situations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The finding was interesting because the OB problem is completely and permanently insoluble by rats with injuries to the posterior cortex (Horel, Bettinger, Royce, & Meyer, 1966;Jonason et aI., 1970;Lavond, Hata, Gray, Geckler, Meyer, & Meyer, 1978). Hence, if there is, in fact, a consequence of OB training for postoperative performance of the BW problem, the conse- quence is uninterpretable in terms of transfer of training that is mediated via reactions to discriminative cues that are present in both situations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Hence, in Table 4, we summarize results from experiments con- Glendenning (1972); KBMM to Kircher, Braun, Meyer, and Meyer (1970); ALEE to an unpublished study of Aileen Lee that is described by Meyer and Meyer (1977); LHGM to Lavond, Hata, Gray, Geckler, Meyer, and Meyer (1978); and GRAY to the present report. All of the data in the table were collected in experiments in which measures of rates of relearning of the BW problem by rats with injuries to the visual cortex were obtained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We now interpret that result to mean that retraining after any injury to the cortex will induce a complete protection of remembering after any further injury that does not complete the destruction of the posterior cortex. In the latter circumstance, a second-stage injury will have a cost of 8 mean trials, and that is because interoperative training will not protect the subject from impairments which result from its not being able to perceive forms (Horel et al , 1966;Lavond & Dewberry, 1980;Lavond, Hata, Gray, Geckler, P Meyer, 1978).…”
Section: Withwhatdo We Remember Memories?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous previous works (Bauer & Cooper, 1964;Bland & Cooper, 1970;Cooper, Blochert, Gillespie, & Miller, 1972;Lavond et al, 1978;Murphy & Chow, 1974;Schilder, Pasik, & Pasik, 1967, 1971, 1972Spear & Baumann, 1979;Spear & Braun, 1969;Weiskrantz, 1963;Winans, 1971) have discussed the question of whether subjects use the same cues or different ones to solve a visual discrimination task before and after a visual cortex injury.…”
Section: Pattern Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%