1994
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090190094027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Field Profile of Optic Neuritis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…58 We have refined the methods previously reported in the 1993 baseline 5 and 1994 1-year follow-up 6 articles. For the purpose of identifying visual field abnormalities in patients with optic neuritis, we developed the current methods based on a visual field classification system developed in 1999 for the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…58 We have refined the methods previously reported in the 1993 baseline 5 and 1994 1-year follow-up 6 articles. For the purpose of identifying visual field abnormalities in patients with optic neuritis, we developed the current methods based on a visual field classification system developed in 1999 for the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification system has evolved during the past 15 years based on the UCDVFRC’s previous experience with the OHTS. 914 We have refined the methods previously reported in our ONTT 1993 baseline 5 and 1994 one-year follow-up 6 studies. The evolution of our Visual Field Classification System involved developing specific parameters and definitions of the OHTS visual field patterns of loss.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most commonly used methods to examine the visual pathways and detect early defects in patients with MS are visual-evoked potentials (VEPs) and visual field testing with standard automated perimetry (SAP) [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2526] The significant defects involving central 2 mfVEP rings have been classified as central scotoma, defect involving central four rings as cecocentral scotoma, defect in upper or lower field of 6 mfVEP rings as altitudinal defect, temporal or nasal field defect of 6 mfVEP rings as hemianopia defect and defect involving all the quadrants in mfVEP six rings as diffuse or generalized defect.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%