Proceedings Computer Graphics International, 2004.
DOI: 10.1109/cgi.2004.1309241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

'Visual-fidelity' dataglove calibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This stems from the fact that even identical postures can produce different sensor values when the sizes of the subjects' hands vary. One way to tackle this problem is to perform a calibration process as in Kahlesz et al [14]. However, this process can be complex, timeconsuming and in itself error-prone.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This stems from the fact that even identical postures can produce different sensor values when the sizes of the subjects' hands vary. One way to tackle this problem is to perform a calibration process as in Kahlesz et al [14]. However, this process can be complex, timeconsuming and in itself error-prone.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to cross-couplings between the sensors, however, more complex forms of calibration are necessary to achieve a satisfactory fidelity. In Kahlesz et al [14] some recent calibration techniques are summarized. Since our objective was to spare any calibration process, the raw sensor readings, as transmitted by the Cyberglove 2, were used directly as feature vector for hand posture classification.…”
Section: Data Glovementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work by [Kahlesz et al 2004;Steffen et al 2011] also reports severe coupling problems in their experiments. Their calibration methods synthesize training data using parabolic functions, to avoid too much sampling work.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…hand sizes, influences from sensor stretching as well as other factors that cause reading variance. For example, the abduction sensors between fingers are stretched by finger flexion movements, and thus can not be accurately calibrated by methods that assume sensor independence [Kahlesz et al 2004]. The false assumption of exact sensor linearity restricts flexible sampling which either causes over-fitting or fails to get solutions [Griffin et al 2000;Hu et al 2004].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation