2015
DOI: 10.1111/cgf.12639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Exploration of High‐Dimensional Data through Subspace Analysis and Dynamic Projections

Abstract: We introduce a novel interactive framework for visualizing and exploring high-dimensional datasets based on subspace analysis and dynamic projections. We assume the high-dimensional dataset can be represented by a mixture of low-dimensional linear subspaces with mixed dimensions, and provide a method to reliably estimate the intrinsic dimension and linear basis of each subspace extracted from the subspace clustering. Subsequently, we use these bases to define unique 2D linear projections as viewpoints from whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(78 reference statements)
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the selection of the dataset and the choice of the dimensions of the projection plane affect the outcome of PCA or PCoA remarkably. Refined methods have been proposed to visualize multidimensional data, which facilitate the search for a suitable projection plane …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the selection of the dataset and the choice of the dimensions of the projection plane affect the outcome of PCA or PCoA remarkably. Refined methods have been proposed to visualize multidimensional data, which facilitate the search for a suitable projection plane …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sedlmair et al [SHB∗14] provide a comprehensive survey of visual analytics tools for analyzing the parameter space of models. Example types of models used by these visual analytics tools include regression [MP13], clustering [NHM∗07, CD19, KEV∗18, SKB∗18], classification [VDEvW11, CLKP10], dimension reduction [CLL∗13, JZF∗09, NM13, AWD12, LWT∗15], and domain‐specific modeling approaches including climate models [WLSL17]. In these examples, the user directly constructs or modifies the parameters of the model through the interaction of sliders or interactive visual elements within the visualization.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other systems such as [44] provide analysts with drop-down menus to select a distance metric. Further options are to let the analyst determine interesting features in combination with subspace clustering (e.g., [41]) or quality metrics (e.g., [31]). S4 Feature Selection & Emphasis was the most frequently implemented interaction scenario (37).…”
Section: S4 Feature Selection and Emphasismentioning
confidence: 99%