1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf00160610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual evoked potentials to various check patterns

Abstract: A target screen stimulus takes into account the necessity of larger checkerboard patterns with rising eccentricity. The target pattern should be calculated to fit the retinocortical magnification factor. This proposition is based on the working hypothesis that for maximal visual evoked potential (VEP) amplitude the stimulus should appear on the cortex as an undistorted checkerboard pattern. We describe the cortical response elicited by four different target screen stimuli based on a similar algorithm. No signi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Checkerboards (image dimensions are 1024 × 1024 pixels) were radial and consisted of twenty rings, each of which was divided into 18 sectors of interchanging white and black color. This layout compensated for the increase in receptive-field size with eccentricity 30 , 31 . There were four pairs of checkerboard patterns with different proportions of white pixels, corresponding to luminance ratios of 12.5%, 25%, 37.5%, and 50%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Checkerboards (image dimensions are 1024 × 1024 pixels) were radial and consisted of twenty rings, each of which was divided into 18 sectors of interchanging white and black color. This layout compensated for the increase in receptive-field size with eccentricity 30 , 31 . There were four pairs of checkerboard patterns with different proportions of white pixels, corresponding to luminance ratios of 12.5%, 25%, 37.5%, and 50%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…All stimuli (1280 × 1024 pixels) were radial in nature and consisted of 20 rings, each of which was divided into 18 sectors with neighboring sectors being of opposite color. The radial nature of the stimuli compensated for the increase in receptive-field size with eccentricity [ 15 , 16 ]. There were four different pairs of checkerboard patterns that systematically varied in terms of luminance ratio: Level 1 corresponds to 12.5% white pixels, Level 2 corresponds to 25% white pixels, Level 3 corresponds to 37.5% white pixels, and Level 4 corresponds to 50% white pixels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All stimuli (1280 Â 1024 pixels) had a radial nature and consisted of 20 rings, each of which was divided into 18 sectors with neighbouring sectors being of opposite phase. The radial nature of the stimuli compensated for the increase in receptive-field size with eccentricity (Zemon and Ratliff, 1982;Rover and Bach, 1985). The luminance for white pixels was 138.6 cd/m 2 and for black pixels 0.25 cd/m 2 (Minolta: LS 110), representing a Michelson contrast of 99.6%.…”
Section: Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%