1980
DOI: 10.1016/0301-0511(80)90031-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual evoked potentials associated with the verbal and non-verbal problem-solving processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These P260 amplitude changes across positions in 50 ms session seem to coincide with the findings reported by Kitajima et al(1980Kitajima et al( , 1983 in which they demonstrated larger amplitude of the P260 (P270 in their papers) at late stimulus positions using stimulus duration of 300 ms. The P260 amplitude changes in 25 ms session seem to coincide with the findings reported by Kitajima et al(1981) in which they demonstrated large amplitude at stimulus position 1 and small amplitude at stimulus positions 2-3 using stimulus duration of a fraction of a millisecond or 10ms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These P260 amplitude changes across positions in 50 ms session seem to coincide with the findings reported by Kitajima et al(1980Kitajima et al( , 1983 in which they demonstrated larger amplitude of the P260 (P270 in their papers) at late stimulus positions using stimulus duration of 300 ms. The P260 amplitude changes in 25 ms session seem to coincide with the findings reported by Kitajima et al(1981) in which they demonstrated large amplitude at stimulus position 1 and small amplitude at stimulus positions 2-3 using stimulus duration of a fraction of a millisecond or 10ms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The habituation paradigm consists of a series of stimuli, habituation, test, and dishabituation (Thompson & Spencer, 1966;Groves & Thompson, 1970;Megela, Teyler, & Hesse, 1977;Paul, 1991;Paul & Morotomi, 1996). The repetition of the habituation stimulus led to the P2 decrement (Megela, Teyler, & Hesse, 1977;Paul, 1991, Paul & Morotomi, 1996Kitajima, Murohashi, & Kanoh, 1980, 1981, and the test stimulus recovered the P2 amplitude, depending on its similarity to the habituation stimulus (Megela, Teyler, & Hesse, 1977;Paul, 1991, Paul & Morotomi, 1996. Following the above-mentioned hypothesis of Schendan et al (1998), the P2 decrement to the repeated habituation stimulus can be interpreted to reflect a decline of attentional orientation to stimuli from which new information cannot be further extracted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%