2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2021.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Evoked Potential Abnormalities in Phelan-McDermid Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This observed preservation of early auditory habituation parallels pre-clinical findings in at least one Shank3 mouse model that found no disruption of sensory gating ( Drapeau et al, 2018 ). These results serve as a contrast to findings of reduced electrophysiological amplitude in response to visual stimuli in individuals with PMS ( Siper et al, 2021 ), suggesting dissociation of cortical processing across at least these two sensory domains. Future research should also assess whether cortical responses to somatosensory stimulation resemble vision and parallel the behavioral tactile hyposensitivity found in PMS or if they are incongruent as with audition.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This observed preservation of early auditory habituation parallels pre-clinical findings in at least one Shank3 mouse model that found no disruption of sensory gating ( Drapeau et al, 2018 ). These results serve as a contrast to findings of reduced electrophysiological amplitude in response to visual stimuli in individuals with PMS ( Siper et al, 2021 ), suggesting dissociation of cortical processing across at least these two sensory domains. Future research should also assess whether cortical responses to somatosensory stimulation resemble vision and parallel the behavioral tactile hyposensitivity found in PMS or if they are incongruent as with audition.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Given overlap with the sample used in the previous study (Siper et al, 2016), the current study included additional useable data from 12 nonautistic and 41 autistic children with the long condition, and 13 nonautistic and 40 autistic children with the short condition. (Since this work was submitted, an article is now in press with a focus on Phelan‐McDermid syndrome using a similar sample, analysis of MSC values, and amplitudes of time‐domain deflections [P 60 ‐N 75 and N 75 ‐P 100 , but not P 100 ‐N 135 ], but it does not include the novel measures and techniques introduced here [analysis of total power, signal power, noise power within each frequency band, and correlations of time‐domain and frequency‐domain measures] (Siper et al, 2021). When possible, monocular and binocular visual acuities were measured using an optotype chart at 114 cm from the screen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reports from ASD in humans and, recently, in different animal models of neurodevelopmental disorders associated with ASD showed alterations in visual processing 58 , 64 , 71 . Recently, evidence of an increased sensitivity of V1 neurons to stimuli with high spatial frequency and low contrast was reported in a mouse model of MeCP2 duplication syndrome 74 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similarly, people with ASD showed enhancement activity in areas related to visual perception when they were exposed to objects, faces, and words in a visual perception task 58 . Importantly, quantification of visual attention showed that ASD individuals had a more robust image center bias regardless of object distributions and reduced saliency for faces 71 , besides an EEG study performed in children with ASD (Phelan–McDermid syndrome and idiopathic ASD) displayed abnormal waveforms of visual evoked potentials 64 . All these data strongly suggest that ASD individuals exhibit atypical visual processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%