2006
DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000205583.85178.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Documentation of Oral Consent: A New Method of Informed Consent before Major Gigantomastia Reduction for an Illiterate Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[64] Med Care 2000Neuro/OrtUSA393Oral and written information vs. pc-based videopc-based videoChan et al. [61] Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002Ent/Gen surgCanada125Oral vs. oral and written information with figuresOral and written with figuresMason et al [69] BJOG 2003GynUK31Oral vs. oral and video informationOral and videoRossi et al [73] Arthroscopy 2005OrtUSA150Oral vs. oral and video informationOral and videoDanino et al [62] Plast Reconstr Surg 2006Plast SurgFrance60Oral vs. oral and video informationOral and videoMoseley et al [71] Br J Ophthalmol 2006OphUSA90Oral vs. oral and dia or video informationOral and dia or videoKeulers et al [66] Patient Educ Couns 2007Plast SurgNetherlands113Oral and written vs. pc-based informationpc-basedMasood et al [70] BJU Int 2007UroUK45Oral vs. oral and written informationOral onlyEggers et al [42] Obesity 2007…”
Section: Future Improvements Of Surgical Informed Consentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[64] Med Care 2000Neuro/OrtUSA393Oral and written information vs. pc-based videopc-based videoChan et al. [61] Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002Ent/Gen surgCanada125Oral vs. oral and written information with figuresOral and written with figuresMason et al [69] BJOG 2003GynUK31Oral vs. oral and video informationOral and videoRossi et al [73] Arthroscopy 2005OrtUSA150Oral vs. oral and video informationOral and videoDanino et al [62] Plast Reconstr Surg 2006Plast SurgFrance60Oral vs. oral and video informationOral and videoMoseley et al [71] Br J Ophthalmol 2006OphUSA90Oral vs. oral and dia or video informationOral and dia or videoKeulers et al [66] Patient Educ Couns 2007Plast SurgNetherlands113Oral and written vs. pc-based informationpc-basedMasood et al [70] BJU Int 2007UroUK45Oral vs. oral and written informationOral onlyEggers et al [42] Obesity 2007…”
Section: Future Improvements Of Surgical Informed Consentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An effective way of informing patients about their surgical procedure might be by using computer-based information [23,51,58]. The more interactive information is provided, the more a patient remembers (Table 1) [ 11,13,24,34,40,42,[58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76]. Nonetheless, the amount of information that is transferred during a preoperative consultation in an outpatient environment can be overwhelming [41].…”
Section: Future Improvements Of Surgical Informed Consentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases with language barrier the visual documentation of oral consent, as described by Danino et al, was used. 20 The breast tissue removed was weighed and documented at the time of surgery. The evaluation criteria were as follows: duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, complication rate, duration of dressing care, and patient satisfaction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%