Proceedings of the 2015 British HCI Conference 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2783446.2783580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual diversity and user interface quality

Abstract: Live graphical user interfaces (GUIs) do change responding to user actions, unlike GUI screenshots, which are often used in studies. The user experiences and is affected by transitions between the layouts (e.g., webpages or mobile app screens) of interactive systems. Such transitions affect the overall impression of system quality and should be accounted for by any model or computational method estimating the quality and claiming high ecological validity. However, the recent efforts aspiring to predict GUI qua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given Scout's focus on spatial arrangement, we defined diversity as spatial diversity. Although there are existing computer vision dissimilarity metrics [34], they are not suitable to compare the wireframes from our study (i.e., the fact that wireframes are primarily whitespace causes these approaches to fail). We instead developed a spatial diversity score to estimate the effort needed to adapt one layout to another (i.e, transformation distance [16]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given Scout's focus on spatial arrangement, we defined diversity as spatial diversity. Although there are existing computer vision dissimilarity metrics [34], they are not suitable to compare the wireframes from our study (i.e., the fact that wireframes are primarily whitespace causes these approaches to fail). We instead developed a spatial diversity score to estimate the effort needed to adapt one layout to another (i.e, transformation distance [16]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with our comment on the quality attributes regarding UI quality, also in terms of assessment methods there is huge room for improvement. Significant effort still needs to be invested into the development of proper guidelines for the design of intuitive and robust task UIs, as well as into automated methods of their assessment, e.g., as attempted by Miniukovich and De Angeli [2015]. -Runtime analytics.…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior work has explored models for predicting users' first impressions of web pages [31,18], mobile app screens [25,24], and mobile app icons [27]. Other research has focused on predicting longer-term perception based on animations [36], menus [21], and visual diversity and consistency between different screens [37,26].…”
Section: User Perception Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%