1969
DOI: 10.1080/14640746908400196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Complexity and Stimulus Pacing in Chicks

Abstract: Two groups were tested for spontaneous alternation using massed and spaced trials but alternation rate was not above chance level. Two experiments then examined the use of visual stimuli as pacers for an approach response. The results indicate that subjects responded to complexity and that complexity may be a more effective pacer than novelty.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is apparent that the stimulus effects operate both between Ss with novelty controlled and within Ss. There is close agreement between the results of Experiment 3 and those obtained by Dutch (1969) with chicks in a similar situation. CONCLUSION The resul ts of these three experiments support the hypothesis that the effects of increasing the complexity of visual stimuli produces behavior which conforms to an inverted U-shaped function, demonstrating an optimum level of stimulus complexity in the approach behavior of rats.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…It is apparent that the stimulus effects operate both between Ss with novelty controlled and within Ss. There is close agreement between the results of Experiment 3 and those obtained by Dutch (1969) with chicks in a similar situation. CONCLUSION The resul ts of these three experiments support the hypothesis that the effects of increasing the complexity of visual stimuli produces behavior which conforms to an inverted U-shaped function, demonstrating an optimum level of stimulus complexity in the approach behavior of rats.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…For example, rhesus monkeys worked harder to view complex rather than simple projected images (Humphrey, 1972). More specifically, chicks approached cards with complex patterns more than plain or simply patterned ones (Berryman, Fullerton, & Sluckin, 1971;Dutch, 1969). Similarly, televised images of screensavers were more attractive to chicks than blank, illuminated monitors (Jones et al, 1996.…”
Section: Experiments 5: Complex Vs Simple Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examined chicks' responses to simultaneously presented video images of simple (S, bouncing green square) and more complex (F, fish) screensavers. Dutch (1969) defined complexity as "the number of elements constituting each stimulus". This definition was applied here; the screensavers used differed in the variety of colours and moving objects as well as in the size and the number of images on screen.…”
Section: Experiments 5: Complex Vs Simple Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%